PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSTU vs. TSLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSTU vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -70.88% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's 11.42% return.


MSTU

1D
-10.37%
1M
-61.22%
YTD
-70.88%
6M
-73.38%
1Y
-96.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLZ

1D
11.56%
1M
18.35%
YTD
11.42%
6M
29.37%
1Y
-51.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTU vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSTU
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF
-70.88%-89.07%205.47%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
11.42%-75.98%-81.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTU and TSLZ is -0.42, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024

-0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSTU vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTU
MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLZ
TSLZ Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
TSLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTU vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSTUTSLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

0.94

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

-0.71

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

-0.91

-0.32

MSTU vs. TSLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is comparable to the TSLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTU and TSLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSTU vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -99.06%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and TSLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSTUTSLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.06%

-99.11%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-97.73%

-72.88%

-24.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.06%

-98.83%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.57%

-75.70%

+3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

78.30%

57.22%

+21.08%

Volatility

MSTU vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a higher volatility of 44.20% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) at 27.70%. This indicates that MSTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSTUTSLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.20%

27.70%

+16.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

114.02%

56.77%

+57.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

142.01%

88.07%

+53.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

168.53%

116.88%

+51.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

168.53%

116.88%

+51.65%

MSTU vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSTU and TSLZ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.


Dividends

MSTU vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison

MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSTU
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSLZ
T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF
0.62%0.69%2.08%12.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSTU and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTU has higher volatility (44.20%) compared to TSLZ (27.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTU dropped -99.06% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.

On 1-year performance, TSLZ leads with -51.89% vs -96.65% for MSTU. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 27.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLZ has performed better with a -51.89% return vs -96.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSTU and TSLZ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.

TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.

MSTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities.

TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.60 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSTU and TSLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer