MSTU vs. TSLZ
MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while TSLZ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTU returned -95.37% vs -64.19% for TSLZ. At a correlation of -0.42, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.
Performance
MSTU vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -54.27% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -5.69% return.
MSTU
- 1D
- -14.03%
- 1M
- -55.66%
- YTD
- -54.27%
- 6M
- -71.83%
- 1Y
- -95.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLZ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -17.84%
- YTD
- -5.69%
- 6M
- -9.62%
- 1Y
- -64.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTU vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | -54.27% | -89.07% | 197.84% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -5.69% | -75.98% | -81.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTU and TSLZ is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2024 | -0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTU vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
MSTU
TSLZ
MSTU vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 0.90 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.84 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | -1.06 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | -0.70 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | -0.67 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
MSTU vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.58% | -99.11% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -96.58% | -76.62% | -19.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.52% | -99.01% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.94% | -75.36% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 75.17% | 60.60% | +14.57% |
Volatility
MSTU vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a higher volatility of 39.06% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) at 24.09%. This indicates that MSTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTU | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 39.06% | 24.09% | +14.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 111.87% | 54.94% | +56.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.62% | 91.64% | +46.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 169.06% | 117.04% | +52.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 169.06% | 117.04% | +52.02% |
MSTU vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSTU and TSLZ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.
Dividends
MSTU vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.73% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTU and TSLZ have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTU has higher volatility (39.06%) compared to TSLZ (24.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTU dropped -98.58% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.
On 1-year performance, TSLZ leads with -64.19% vs -95.37% for MSTU. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, TSLZ has been the lower-risk option at 24.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLZ has performed better with a -64.19% return vs -95.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTU and TSLZ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.
TSLZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.
MSTU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLZ is Inverse Equities.
MSTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.69 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTU and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer