MSTU vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MSTU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

MSTU vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -78.22% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 266.23% return.

MSTU

• 1D: 2.84%
• 1M: -15.81%
• 6M: -72.32%
• YTD: -78.22%
• 1Y: -97.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -75.33%

LINT

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -46.62%
• 6M: 135.02%
• YTD: 266.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.84M	$20.02M	$35.16M
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF	$200.96M	$178.85M	$198.52M

MSTU vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF	-78.22%	-50.83%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	266.23%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTU and LINT is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.26

MSTU vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSTU	LINT
Technology	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MSTU vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSTU

MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 2
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSTU vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSTU	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.36	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.76	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.99	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	—	—

Drawdowns

MSTU vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -99.43%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTU	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.43%	-69.02%	-30.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-98.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.29%	-62.23%	-37.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.16%	-24.07%	-50.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	80.83%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSTU	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.84%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	119.27%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	147.80%	169.02%	-21.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	168.37%	169.02%	-0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	168.37%	169.02%	-0.65%

MSTU vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTU vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%.

Position	TTM	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.74%	0.25%
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTU and LINT in my portfolio?

MSTU and LINT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSTU or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTU or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTU or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.

What is the main difference between MSTU and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTU and 0.97% for LINT.