MSTU vs. COIG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) and COIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTU returned -94.94% vs -78.85% for COIG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSTU charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COIG.

Performance

MSTU vs. COIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -52.47% return, which is significantly higher than COIG's -61.94% return.

MSTU

• 1D: 3.95%
• 1M: -55.32%
• YTD: -52.47%
• 6M: -69.89%
• 1Y: -94.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COIG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -34.67%
• YTD: -61.94%
• 6M: -74.70%
• 1Y: -78.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTU vs. COIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF	-52.47%	-86.33%
COIG Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF	-61.94%	-9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTU and COIG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2025	0.75

The correlation between MSTU and COIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MSTU vs. COIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTU

MSTU Risk / Return Rank: 2
MSTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MSTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
MSTU Omega Ratio Rank: 1
MSTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
MSTU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

COIG

COIG Risk / Return Rank: 4
COIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
COIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
COIG Omega Ratio Rank: 5
COIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
COIG Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTU vs. COIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSTU	COIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.69	-0.57	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.03	-0.63	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.78	0.93	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	-0.86	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.26	-1.19	-0.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSTU vs. COIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTU Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is comparable to the COIG Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTU and COIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSTU	COIG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.69	-0.57	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.40	-0.40	0.00

Drawdowns

MSTU vs. COIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than COIG's maximum drawdown of -92.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and COIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTU	COIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.58%	-92.06%	-6.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-96.58%	-92.06%	-4.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.46%	-91.44%	-7.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-72.00%	-51.83%	-20.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	75.41%	66.13%	+9.28%

Volatility

MSTU vs. COIG - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COIN Daily ETF (COIG) have volatilities of 39.21% and 37.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTU	COIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.21%	37.76%	+1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	111.33%	100.15%	+11.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.43%	138.95%	-0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	168.89%	146.21%	+22.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	168.89%	146.21%	+22.68%

MSTU vs. COIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTU has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than COIG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTU vs. COIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSTU nor COIG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTU and COIG in my portfolio?

MSTU and COIG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSTU or COIG?

MSTU has higher volatility (39.21%) compared to COIG (37.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTU dropped -98.58% vs COIG's -92.06%.

Which ETF is better, MSTU or COIG?

On 1-year performance, COIG leads with -78.85% vs -94.94% for MSTU. On fees, COIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, COIG has been the lower-risk option at 37.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSTU or COIG?

Over the 1-year period, COIG has performed better with a -78.85% return vs -94.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTU or COIG?

COIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for MSTU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTU or COIG?

MSTU and COIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MSTU and COIG?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for MSTU and 0.75% for COIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.57 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.