MSTU vs. AAPX
MSTU (T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF) and AAPX (T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTU returned -96.65% vs 81.26% for AAPX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.
Performance
MSTU vs. AAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTU achieves a -70.88% return, which is significantly lower than AAPX's 8.46% return.
MSTU
- 1D
- -10.37%
- 1M
- -61.22%
- YTD
- -70.88%
- 6M
- -73.38%
- 1Y
- -96.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAPX
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- 1Y
- 81.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTU vs. AAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | -70.88% | -89.07% | 205.47% |
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 8.46% | -4.95% | 29.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTU and AAPX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2024 | 0.20 |
MSTU vs. AAPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSTU
AAPX
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MSTU
AAPX
Basic Materials
MSTU
-
AAPX
-
Communication Services
MSTU
-
AAPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
MSTU
-
AAPX
-
Consumer Defensive
MSTU
-
AAPX
-
Energy
MSTU
-
AAPX
-
Financial Services
MSTU
-
AAPX
-
Healthcare
MSTU
-
AAPX
-
Industrials
MSTU
-
AAPX
-
Real Estate
MSTU
-
AAPX
-
Utilities
MSTU
-
AAPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTU vs. AAPX — Risk / Return Rank
MSTU
AAPX
MSTU vs. AAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) and T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTU | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 1.31 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 2.71 | -3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.23 | 6.32 | -7.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTU vs. AAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTU drawdown since its inception was -99.06%, which is greater than AAPX's maximum drawdown of -58.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTU and AAPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTU | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.06% | -58.55% | -40.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -97.73% | -30.12% | -67.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.06% | -13.68% | -85.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.57% | -19.16% | -53.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 78.30% | 12.90% | +65.40% |
Volatility
MSTU vs. AAPX - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU) has a higher volatility of 44.20% compared to T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF (AAPX) at 14.33%. This indicates that MSTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTU | AAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.20% | 14.33% | +29.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 114.02% | 33.57% | +80.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 142.01% | 45.54% | +96.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 168.53% | 54.49% | +114.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 168.53% | 54.49% | +114.04% |
MSTU vs. AAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSTU and AAPX have an expense ratio of 1.05%.
Dividends
MSTU vs. AAPX - Dividend Comparison
MSTU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAPX T-Rex 2X Long Apple Daily Target ETF | 0.61% | 0.67% | 21.46% |
MSTU T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTU and AAPX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTU has higher volatility (44.20%) compared to AAPX (14.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTU dropped -99.06% vs AAPX's -58.55%.
On 1-year performance, AAPX leads with 81.26% vs -96.65% for MSTU. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, AAPX has been the lower-risk option at 14.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AAPX has performed better with a 81.26% return vs -96.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTU and AAPX have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.
AAPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.00% for MSTU.
AAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTU and AAPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer