MSTQX vs. POGSX
MSTQX (Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund) and POGSX (Pin Oak Equity) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MSTQX returned 5.69%/yr vs 11.89%/yr for POGSX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSTQX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for POGSX.
Performance
MSTQX vs. POGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTQX achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly lower than POGSX's 15.71% return.
MSTQX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- -11.30%
- 1Y
- -2.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- —
POGSX
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 6M
- 17.13%
- 1Y
- 36.63%
- 3Y*
- 26.74%
- 5Y*
- 11.89%
- 10Y*
- 13.76%
MSTQX vs. POGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTQX Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund | 5.36% | -5.56% | 18.94% | 25.24% | -16.29% | 26.15% | 10.49% | 26.02% | -10.45% |
POGSX Pin Oak Equity | 15.71% | 27.41% | 18.99% | 27.16% | -25.10% | 21.42% | 10.60% | 27.72% | -7.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTQX and POGSX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018 | 0.85 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSTQX and POGSX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTQX vs. POGSX — Risk / Return Rank
MSTQX
POGSX
MSTQX vs. POGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) and Pin Oak Equity (POGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTQX | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.52 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 4.62 | -4.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 16.65 | -16.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTQX | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | 2.46 | -2.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.67 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.30 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
MSTQX vs. POGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTQX drawdown since its inception was -36.23%, smaller than the maximum POGSX drawdown of -89.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTQX and POGSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTQX | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.23% | -89.46% | +53.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.58% | -8.03% | -13.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.58% | -15.76% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | -29.81% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.05% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.16% | -1.00% | -11.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -36.72% | +30.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.57% | 2.22% | +7.35% |
Volatility
MSTQX vs. POGSX - Volatility Comparison
Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund (MSTQX) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) at 2.31%. This indicates that MSTQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTQX | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.62% | 2.31% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.33% | 12.51% | +5.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.09% | 15.09% | +5.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.59% | 17.75% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 18.53% | +2.18% |
MSTQX vs. POGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTQX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than POGSX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTQX vs. POGSX - Dividend Comparison
MSTQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than POGSX's 16.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTQX Morningstar U.S. Equity Fund | 0.65% | 0.69% | 10.80% | 4.21% | 9.79% | 15.98% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
POGSX Pin Oak Equity | 16.42% | 8.85% | 17.87% | 8.21% | 0.15% | 10.93% | 4.60% | 3.22% | 2.94% | 1.79% | 2.03% | 3.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTQX and POGSX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSTQX has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to POGSX (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTQX dropped -36.23% vs POGSX's -89.46%.
POGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTQX and POGSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer