MSTI vs. DIVL
MSTI (Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF) and DIVL (Madison Dividend Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSTI is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by Madison, while DIVL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Madison. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSTI returned 4.30% vs 14.51% for DIVL. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSTI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DIVL.
Performance
MSTI vs. DIVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTI achieves a 0.63% return, which is significantly lower than DIVL's 8.16% return.
MSTI
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 0.87%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DIVL
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 8.16%
- 6M
- 7.23%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTI vs. DIVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTI Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF | 0.63% | 6.33% | 4.84% | 4.14% |
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF | 8.16% | 9.83% | 8.81% | 2.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTI and DIVL is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2023 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTI vs. DIVL — Risk / Return Rank
MSTI
DIVL
MSTI vs. DIVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF (MSTI) and Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTI | DIVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.25 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 2.10 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.50 | 6.36 | +7.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTI | DIVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | 1.38 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.17 | 0.84 | +1.33 |
Drawdowns
MSTI vs. DIVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTI drawdown since its inception was -1.48%, smaller than the maximum DIVL drawdown of -14.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTI and DIVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTI | DIVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.48% | -14.06% | +12.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.32% | -6.93% | +5.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -3.34% | +3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.29% | -2.56% | +2.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | 2.29% | -1.97% |
Volatility
MSTI vs. DIVL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF (MSTI) is 0.58%, while Madison Dividend Value ETF (DIVL) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that MSTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTI | DIVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.58% | 3.08% | -2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.61% | 8.05% | -6.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45% | 10.55% | -8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 12.39% | -9.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.71% | 12.39% | -9.68% |
MSTI vs. DIVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTI vs. DIVL - Dividend Comparison
MSTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than DIVL's 1.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DIVL Madison Dividend Value ETF | 1.77% | 1.80% | 2.19% | 1.01% |
MSTI Madison Short-Term Strategic Income ETF | 5.34% | 5.40% | 5.48% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTI and DIVL have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIVL has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to MSTI (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSTI dropped -1.48% vs DIVL's -14.06%.
On 1-year performance, DIVL leads with 14.51% vs 4.30% for MSTI. On fees, MSTI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, MSTI has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DIVL has performed better with a 14.51% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSTI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVL.
MSTI has the higher dividend yield at 5.34%, compared with 1.77% for DIVL.
MSTI is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DIVL is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MSTI and 0.65% for DIVL.
MSTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSTI and DIVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer