MSTE.TO vs. CNQE.TO
MSTE.TO (Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) and CNQE.TO (Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Harvest. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
MSTE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTE.TO achieves a -20.32% return, which is significantly lower than CNQE.TO's 39.35% return.
MSTE.TO
- 1D
- -8.67%
- 1M
- -33.14%
- YTD
- -20.32%
- 6M
- -37.71%
- 1Y
- -71.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNQE.TO
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 39.35%
- 6M
- 37.15%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTE.TO Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | -20.32% | -59.96% |
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 39.35% | 13.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTE.TO and CNQE.TO is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTE.TO vs. CNQE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MSTE.TO
CNQE.TO
MSTE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (MSTE.TO) and Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF (CNQE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSTE.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSTE.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 2.48 | -3.16 |
Drawdowns
MSTE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTE.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.35%, which is greater than CNQE.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTE.TO and CNQE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTE.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.35% | -18.22% | -62.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -80.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.21% | -6.08% | -70.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.63% | -4.12% | -35.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 53.78% | — | — |
Volatility
MSTE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTE.TO | CNQE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.31% | 33.12% | +44.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 84.31% | 33.12% | +51.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 84.31% | 33.12% | +51.19% |
MSTE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSTE.TO and CNQE.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
MSTE.TO vs. CNQE.TO - Dividend Comparison
MSTE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 149.64%, more than CNQE.TO's 9.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CNQE.TO Harvest CNQ Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 9.40% | 4.42% |
MSTE.TO Harvest MicroStrategy Enhanced High Income Shares ETF | 149.64% | 121.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTE.TO and CNQE.TO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSTE.TO and CNQE.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
Find the right allocation for MSTE.TO and CNQE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer