MSTB vs. SPYA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSTB (LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF) and SPYA (Twin Oak Endure ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. MSTB is passively managed, while SPYA is actively managed. Over the past year, MSTB returned 20.33% vs 20.68% for SPYA. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSTB charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SPYA.

Performance

MSTB vs. SPYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTB achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly higher than SPYA's 8.05% return.

MSTB

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 3.88%
• YTD: 8.71%
• 6M: 8.70%
• 1Y: 20.33%
• 3Y*: 18.51%
• 5Y*: 8.55%
• 10Y*: —

SPYA

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 5.09%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 7.32%
• 1Y: 20.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTB vs. SPYA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSTB LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF	8.71%	10.69%
SPYA Twin Oak Endure ETF	8.05%	11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between MSTB and SPYA is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	0.88

Return for Risk

MSTB vs. SPYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTB

MSTB Risk / Return Rank: 56
MSTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MSTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
MSTB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
MSTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
MSTB Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTB vs. SPYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Twin Oak Endure ETF (SPYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSTB	SPYA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.32	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSTB	SPYA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	1.87	-1.04

Drawdowns

MSTB vs. SPYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTB drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than SPYA's maximum drawdown of -9.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTB and SPYA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTB	SPYA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.64%	-9.51%	-16.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-9.51%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-0.66%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-1.45%	-5.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSTB	SPYA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.43%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.21%	11.15%	-0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.97%	11.15%	+2.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.84%	11.15%	+2.69%

MSTB vs. SPYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTB has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYA's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSTB vs. SPYA - Dividend Comparison

MSTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than SPYA's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MSTB LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF	0.38%	0.41%	0.95%	0.16%	1.34%	2.20%	1.78%
SPYA Twin Oak Endure ETF	0.35%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSTB and SPYA in my portfolio?

MSTB and SPYA have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSTB or SPYA?

On 1-year performance, SPYA leads with 20.68% vs 20.33% for MSTB. On fees, SPYA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSTB or SPYA?

Over the 1-year period, SPYA has performed better with a 20.68% return vs 20.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSTB or SPYA?

SPYA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for MSTB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSTB or SPYA?

MSTB has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.35% for SPYA.

What is the main difference between MSTB and SPYA?

They also come from different issuers: Little Harbor Advisors and Twin Oak. Their fees differ too: 1.40% for MSTB and 0.49% for SPYA.