MSTB vs. HEDG
MSTB (LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF) and HEDG (Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds - MSTB tracks the S&P 500® Index while HEDG tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSTB charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for HEDG.
Performance
MSTB vs. HEDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSTB achieves a 5.36% return, which is significantly higher than HEDG's 2.54% return.
MSTB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- YTD
- 5.36%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- 15.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- —
HEDG
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSTB vs. HEDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSTB LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF | 5.36% | 2.59% |
HEDG Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF | 2.54% | 3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSTB and HEDG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2025 | 0.73 |
MSTB vs. HEDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSTB
HEDG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
MSTB
HEDG
Financial Services
MSTB
HEDG
Communication Services
MSTB
HEDG
Consumer Cyclical
MSTB
HEDG
Healthcare
MSTB
HEDG
Industrials
MSTB
HEDG
Consumer Defensive
MSTB
HEDG
Energy
MSTB
HEDG
Utilities
MSTB
HEDG
Real Estate
MSTB
HEDG
Basic Materials
MSTB
HEDG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSTB vs. HEDG — Risk / Return Rank
MSTB
HEDG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSTB vs. HEDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF (HEDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSTB | HEDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.87 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSTB vs. HEDG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSTB drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than HEDG's maximum drawdown of -3.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTB and HEDG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSTB | HEDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.64% | -3.85% | -21.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -0.73% | -2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.13% | -0.39% | -6.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | — | — |
Volatility
MSTB vs. HEDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSTB | HEDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.65% | 5.86% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 5.86% | +8.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 5.86% | +7.99% |
MSTB vs. HEDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSTB has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than HEDG's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSTB vs. HEDG - Dividend Comparison
MSTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than HEDG's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HEDG Equable Shares Hedged Equity ETF | 2.35% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSTB LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF | 0.39% | 0.41% | 0.95% | 0.16% | 1.34% | 2.20% | 1.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSTB and HEDG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HEDG is cheaper at 0.96% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEDG is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.40% for MSTB.
HEDG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.39% for MSTB.
MSTB tracks S&P 500® Index, while HEDG tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Little Harbor Advisors and Equable Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.40% for MSTB and 0.96% for HEDG.
Find the right allocation for MSTB and HEDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer