MSTB vs. FHEQ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ).

MSTB and FHEQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MSTB is a passively managed fund by Little Harbor Advisors that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2020. FHEQ is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 9, 2024.

Performance

MSTB vs. FHEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MSTB vs. FHEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSTB LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF	-4.06%	18.57%	8.89%
FHEQ Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF	-4.63%	13.34%	10.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSTB achieves a -4.06% return, which is significantly higher than FHEQ's -4.63% return.

MSTB

• 1D: 2.06%
• 1M: -4.32%
• YTD: -4.06%
• 6M: -3.31%
• 1Y: 19.00%
• 3Y*: 14.50%
• 5Y*: 6.74%
• 10Y*: —

FHEQ

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -3.81%
• YTD: -4.63%
• 6M: -3.79%
• 1Y: 12.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSTB vs. FHEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSTB has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FHEQ's 0.48% expense ratio.

MSTB

LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF

FHEQ

Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF

Return for Risk

MSTB vs. FHEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSTB

MSTB Risk / Return Rank: 82
MSTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
MSTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
MSTB Omega Ratio Rank: 79
MSTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
MSTB Martin Ratio Rank: 83

FHEQ

FHEQ Risk / Return Rank: 63
FHEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FHEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FHEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FHEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FHEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSTB vs. FHEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) and Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSTB	FHEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.11	+0.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	1.64	+0.58
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.21	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.36	1.63	+0.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.27	6.47	+2.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSTB vs. FHEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSTB Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the FHEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSTB and FHEQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSTB	FHEQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.11	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.92	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between MSTB and FHEQ is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MSTB vs. FHEQ - Dividend Comparison

MSTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than FHEQ's 0.67% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MSTB LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF	0.43%	0.41%	0.95%	0.16%	1.34%	2.20%	1.78%
FHEQ Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF	0.67%	0.63%	0.50%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MSTB vs. FHEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSTB drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, which is greater than FHEQ's maximum drawdown of -11.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSTB and FHEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSTB	FHEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.64%	-11.12%	-14.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-7.77%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.43%	-6.18%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.38%	-1.89%	-5.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	1.96%	+0.16%

Volatility

MSTB vs. FHEQ - Volatility Comparison

LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF (MSTB) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) at 2.85%. This indicates that MSTB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FHEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSTB	FHEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	2.85%	+0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.00%	7.07%	+0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.19%	11.08%	+1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.00%	10.40%	+3.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.94%	10.40%	+3.54%