MSST vs. EINC
MSST (YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSST is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. MSST is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. MSST charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
MSST vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSST achieves a -20.98% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.51% return.
MSST
- 1D
- -7.10%
- 1M
- -34.34%
- YTD
- -20.98%
- 6M
- -31.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- YTD
- 25.51%
- 6M
- 23.55%
- 1Y
- 27.75%
- 3Y*
- 29.36%
- 5Y*
- 20.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
MSST vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | -20.98% | -22.94% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 25.51% | 1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSST and EINC is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSST vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
MSST
EINC
MSST vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (MSST) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSST | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.83 | 0.04 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
MSST vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSST drawdown since its inception was -44.05%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSST and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSST | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.05% | -87.55% | +43.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.11% | -4.85% | -34.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -44.27% | +22.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility
MSST vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSST | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.68% | 14.70% | +57.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.68% | 19.57% | +53.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.68% | 25.43% | +47.25% |
MSST vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSST vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
MSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.99%, more than EINC's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.53% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | 17.99% | 2.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSST and EINC have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSST.
MSST has the higher dividend yield at 17.99%, compared with 3.53% for EINC.
MSST is categorized as Derivative Income, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSST and 0.45% for EINC.
Find the right allocation for MSST and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer