MSST vs. GSG
MSST (YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - MSST is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. MSST is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. MSST charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
MSST vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSST achieves a -20.98% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 36.99% return.
MSST
- 1D
- -7.10%
- 1M
- -34.34%
- YTD
- -20.98%
- 6M
- -31.73%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- 36.99%
- 6M
- 33.63%
- 1Y
- 45.17%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 14.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.06%
MSST vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | -20.98% | -22.94% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 36.99% | -1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSST and GSG is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSST vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
MSST
GSG
MSST vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (MSST) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSST | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.83 | -0.09 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
MSST vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSST drawdown since its inception was -44.05%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSST and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSST | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.05% | -89.62% | +45.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.11% | -58.64% | +19.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.28% | -63.71% | +42.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.66% | — |
Volatility
MSST vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSST | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.68% | 23.15% | +49.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.68% | 22.63% | +50.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 72.68% | 22.04% | +50.64% |
MSST vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSST vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
MSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.99%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSST YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF | 17.99% | 2.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSST and GSG have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSST.
MSST has the higher dividend yield at 17.99%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
MSST is categorized as Derivative Income, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSST and 0.75% for GSG.
Find the right allocation for MSST and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer