PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSST vs. COSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSST vs. COSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (MSST) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSST achieves a -33.85% return, which is significantly lower than COSW's 10.24% return.


MSST

1D
6.17%
1M
-25.86%
6M
-33.85%
YTD
-33.85%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

COSW

1D
3.42%
1M
-0.78%
6M
10.24%
YTD
10.24%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSST vs. COSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSST and COSW is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSST vs. COSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (MSST) and Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSST vs. COSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSST vs. COSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSST drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than COSW's maximum drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSST and COSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSSTCOSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-18.84%

-39.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.11%

-16.06%

-34.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.55%

-5.36%

-20.19%

Volatility

MSST vs. COSW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSSTCOSWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.61%

25.61%

+50.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.61%

25.61%

+50.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.61%

25.61%

+50.00%

MSST vs. COSW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSST and COSW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

MSST vs. COSW - Dividend Comparison

MSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.05%, more than COSW's 20.21% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSST and COSW have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSST and COSW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

MSST has the higher dividend yield at 24.05%, compared with 20.21% for COSW.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSST and COSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer