PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSST vs. CMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSST vs. CMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (MSST) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSST achieves a -20.98% return, which is significantly lower than CMDY's 21.44% return.


MSST

1D
-7.10%
1M
-34.34%
YTD
-20.98%
6M
-31.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CMDY

1D
-2.20%
1M
-3.08%
YTD
21.44%
6M
19.87%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSST vs. CMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSST and CMDY is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSST vs. CMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSST

CMDY
CMDY Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSST vs. CMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF (MSST) and iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF (CMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSST vs. CMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSSTCMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.83

0.53

-1.36

Drawdowns

MSST vs. CMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSST drawdown since its inception was -44.05%, which is greater than CMDY's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSST and CMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSSTCMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.05%

-31.19%

-12.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.11%

-7.04%

-32.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.28%

-13.14%

-8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

Volatility

MSST vs. CMDY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSSTCMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.68%

16.26%

+56.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.68%

15.83%

+56.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.68%

14.65%

+58.03%

MSST vs. CMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSST has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDY's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSST vs. CMDY - Dividend Comparison

MSST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.99%, more than CMDY's 10.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CMDY
iShares Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Strategy ETF
10.62%12.89%4.23%5.10%3.98%16.09%0.15%2.21%1.73%
MSST
YieldMax MSTR Performance & Distribution Target 25 ETF
17.99%2.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSST and CMDY have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMDY is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMDY is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSST.

MSST has the higher dividend yield at 17.99%, compared with 10.62% for CMDY.

MSST is categorized as Derivative Income, while CMDY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSST and 0.28% for CMDY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSST and CMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer