MSOX vs. HVAC
MSOX (Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF) and HVAC (AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while HVAC is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSOX returned 28.79% vs 62.74% for HVAC. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSOX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for HVAC.
Performance
MSOX vs. HVAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSOX achieves a -34.60% return, which is significantly lower than HVAC's 39.55% return.
MSOX
- 1D
- -10.94%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- -34.60%
- 6M
- -28.54%
- 1Y
- 28.79%
- 3Y*
- -64.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HVAC
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- 9.02%
- YTD
- 39.55%
- 6M
- 36.71%
- 1Y
- 62.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSOX vs. HVAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | -34.60% | -36.54% |
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF | 39.55% | 23.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSOX and HVAC is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025 | 0.21 |
MSOX vs. HVAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSOX
HVAC
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
MSOX
HVAC
-
Basic Materials
MSOX
-
HVAC
-
Communication Services
MSOX
-
HVAC
-
Consumer Cyclical
MSOX
-
HVAC
Consumer Defensive
MSOX
-
HVAC
-
Energy
MSOX
-
HVAC
-
Healthcare
MSOX
-
HVAC
-
Industrials
MSOX
-
HVAC
Real Estate
MSOX
-
HVAC
Technology
MSOX
-
HVAC
Utilities
MSOX
-
HVAC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSOX vs. HVAC — Risk / Return Rank
MSOX
HVAC
MSOX vs. HVAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) and AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSOX | HVAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 4.25 | -3.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | 14.41 | -13.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSOX vs. HVAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSOX drawdown since its inception was -99.75%, which is greater than HVAC's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOX and HVAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSOX | HVAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.75% | -21.22% | -78.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.89% | -14.83% | -70.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.57% | 0.00% | -99.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.89% | -3.98% | -84.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.94% | 4.37% | +52.57% |
Volatility
MSOX vs. HVAC - Volatility Comparison
Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF (MSOX) has a higher volatility of 41.52% compared to AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) at 11.32%. This indicates that MSOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HVAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSOX | HVAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 41.52% | 11.32% | +30.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 132.97% | 24.03% | +108.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 220.88% | 28.99% | +191.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 168.12% | 30.05% | +138.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 168.12% | 30.05% | +138.07% |
MSOX vs. HVAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than HVAC's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSOX vs. HVAC - Dividend Comparison
MSOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HVAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% |
MSOX Advisorshares Msos 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSOX and HVAC have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSOX has higher volatility (41.52%) compared to HVAC (11.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOX dropped -99.75% vs HVAC's -21.22%.
On 1-year performance, HVAC leads with 62.74% vs 28.79% for MSOX. On fees, MSOX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, HVAC has been the lower-risk option at 11.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HVAC has performed better with a 62.74% return vs 28.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSOX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HVAC.
HVAC has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for MSOX.
MSOX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HVAC is Industrials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for MSOX and 1.00% for HVAC.
HVAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSOX and HVAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer