PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNBS vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNBS vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNBS achieves a -12.28% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -32.53% return.


CNBS

1D
-0.68%
1M
-13.53%
6M
0.51%
YTD
-12.28%
1Y
32.27%
3Y*
-8.99%
5Y*
-33.11%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-25.62%

MSTY

1D
1.13%
1M
-1.52%
6M
-27.05%
YTD
-32.53%
1Y
-68.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$114.17K$102.50K$278.36K
$12.83M$13.14M$28.03M

CNBS vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
-12.28%15.33%-37.20%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-32.53%-42.71%212.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CNBS and MSTY is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNBS vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CNBS
CNBS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
CNBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
CNBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNBS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CNBS vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNBSMSTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

0.79

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

-0.91

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.33

-1.34

+2.67

CNBS vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNBS Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNBS and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNBS vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNBS drawdown since its inception was -95.71%, which is greater than MSTY's maximum drawdown of -77.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNBS and MSTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNBSMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.71%

-77.40%

-18.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.25%

-74.91%

+23.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.36%

-73.47%

-18.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.69%

-29.12%

-42.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.52%

50.95%

-20.43%

Volatility

CNBS vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) is 12.37%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 13.25%. This indicates that CNBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNBSMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.37%

13.25%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.33%

52.14%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

104.84%

64.93%

+39.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.17%

71.85%

-6.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.12%

71.85%

-10.73%

CNBS vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNBS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNBS vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 248.73%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%43.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.58%0.58%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
248.73%294.61%104.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNBS and MSTY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTY has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to CNBS (12.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNBS dropped -95.71% vs MSTY's -77.40%.

On 1-year performance, CNBS leads with 32.27% vs -68.04% for MSTY. On fees, CNBS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CNBS has been the lower-risk option at 12.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CNBS has performed better with a 32.27% return vs -68.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CNBS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTY.

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 248.73%, compared with 0.00% for CNBS.

CNBS is categorized as Cannabis, while MSTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNBS and 0.99% for MSTY.

CNBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNBS and MSTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer