PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNBS vs. MSTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNBS vs. MSTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNBS achieves a -3.21% return, which is significantly higher than MSTY's -35.55% return.


CNBS

1D
3.58%
1M
-5.92%
6M
-9.58%
YTD
-3.21%
1Y
48.36%
3Y*
-5.21%
5Y*
-32.41%
10Y*

MSTY

1D
-2.03%
1M
-23.27%
6M
-39.01%
YTD
-35.55%
1Y
-73.76%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNBS vs. MSTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
-3.21%15.33%-37.20%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
-35.55%-42.71%212.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CNBS and MSTY is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2024

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNBS vs. MSTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNBS
CNBS Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CNBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CNBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNBS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTY
MSTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
MSTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNBS vs. MSTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNBSMSTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.75

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

-0.95

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

-1.41

+3.07

CNBS vs. MSTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNBS Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is higher than the MSTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNBS and MSTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNBS vs. MSTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNBS drawdown since its inception was -95.71%, which is greater than MSTY's maximum drawdown of -77.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNBS and MSTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNBSMSTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.71%

-77.40%

-18.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.25%

-77.40%

+26.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.57%

-74.66%

-16.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.52%

-28.01%

-43.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.30%

52.19%

-22.89%

Volatility

CNBS vs. MSTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) is 15.71%, while YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (MSTY) has a volatility of 23.76%. This indicates that CNBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNBSMSTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.71%

23.76%

-8.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.18%

53.06%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

105.84%

64.61%

+41.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.23%

72.32%

-7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.28%

72.32%

-11.04%

CNBS vs. MSTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNBS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MSTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNBS vs. MSTY - Dividend Comparison

CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 289.43%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%43.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.58%0.58%
MSTY
YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
289.43%294.61%104.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNBS and MSTY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTY has higher volatility (23.76%) compared to CNBS (15.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNBS dropped -95.71% vs MSTY's -77.40%.

On 1-year performance, CNBS leads with 48.36% vs -73.76% for MSTY. On fees, CNBS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CNBS has been the lower-risk option at 15.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CNBS has performed better with a 48.36% return vs -73.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CNBS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSTY.

MSTY has the higher dividend yield at 289.43%, compared with 0.00% for CNBS.

CNBS is categorized as Cannabis, while MSTY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNBS and 0.99% for MSTY.

CNBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNBS and MSTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer