MSOS vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSOS (AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSOS returned 99.16% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. MSOS charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

MSOS vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOS achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.

MSOS

• 1D: -6.14%
• 1M: -2.07%
• YTD: 0.42%
• 6M: 28.46%
• 1Y: 99.16%
• 3Y*: -4.01%
• 5Y*: -35.03%
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOS vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF	0.42%	23.88%	-50.71%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.63%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOS and CSHP is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2024	-0.04

MSOS vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSOS	CSHP
Real Estate	50.2%	-
Industrials	29.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	17.8%	-
Healthcare	2.5%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

MSOS vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOS

MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 32
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 35
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 26

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOS vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSOS	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	11.91	-11.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	31.26	-29.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	7.44	-6.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	65.71	-63.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.58	432.16	-428.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSOS vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSOS Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSOS and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSOS	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	11.91	-11.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.34	10.75	-11.09

Drawdowns

MSOS vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOS drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOS and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOS	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.25%	-0.08%	-96.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-52.91%	-0.06%	-52.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-81.71%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-94.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.37%	0.00%	-91.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.71%	-0.00%	-71.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.78%	0.01%	+27.77%

Volatility

MSOS vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) has a higher volatility of 20.45% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.07%. This indicates that MSOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSOS	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.45%	0.07%	+20.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	80.61%	0.24%	+80.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	112.00%	0.33%	+111.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	77.81%	0.40%	+77.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.04%	0.40%	+73.64%

MSOS vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSOS vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSOS and CSHP in my portfolio?

MSOS and CSHP have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSOS or CSHP?

MSOS has higher volatility (20.45%) compared to CSHP (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSOS dropped -96.25% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, MSOS or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, MSOS leads with 99.16% vs 3.96% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSOS or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, MSOS has performed better with a 99.16% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSOS or CSHP?

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MSOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSOS or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 0.00% for MSOS.

What is the main difference between MSOS and CSHP?

MSOS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MSOS and 0.20% for CSHP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.91 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.