PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSOS vs. ASCE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSOS vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOS achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 22.25% return.


MSOS

1D
-6.14%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
0.42%
6M
28.46%
1Y
99.16%
3Y*
-4.01%
5Y*
-35.03%
10Y*

ASCE

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.38%
YTD
22.25%
6M
21.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOS vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
0.42%80.84%
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
22.25%8.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOS and ASCE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSOS vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOS
MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

ASCE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOS vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSOSASCEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.58

MSOS vs. ASCE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSOSASCEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

1.92

-2.25

Drawdowns

MSOS vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOS drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOS and ASCE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSOSASCEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.25%

-9.22%

-87.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.37%

-0.38%

-90.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-2.10%

-69.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.78%

Volatility

MSOS vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSOSASCEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

112.00%

19.25%

+92.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.81%

19.25%

+58.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.04%

19.25%

+54.79%

MSOS vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSOS vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison

MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ASCE
Allspring SMID Core ETF
0.18%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSOS and ASCE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MSOS.

ASCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for MSOS.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MSOS and 0.38% for ASCE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSOS and ASCE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer