MSOS vs. ASCE
MSOS (AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF) and ASCE (Allspring SMID Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSOS charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for ASCE.
Performance
MSOS vs. ASCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSOS achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than ASCE's 22.25% return.
MSOS
- 1D
- -6.14%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 6M
- 28.46%
- 1Y
- 99.16%
- 3Y*
- -4.01%
- 5Y*
- -35.03%
- 10Y*
- —
ASCE
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 22.25%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSOS vs. ASCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF | 0.42% | 80.84% |
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 22.25% | 8.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSOS and ASCE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSOS vs. ASCE — Risk / Return Rank
MSOS
ASCE
MSOS vs. ASCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) and Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSOS | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.58 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSOS | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.34 | 1.92 | -2.25 |
Drawdowns
MSOS vs. ASCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSOS drawdown since its inception was -96.25%, which is greater than ASCE's maximum drawdown of -9.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOS and ASCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSOS | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.25% | -9.22% | -87.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.37% | -0.38% | -90.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.71% | -2.10% | -69.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.78% | — | — |
Volatility
MSOS vs. ASCE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSOS | ASCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 80.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 112.00% | 19.25% | +92.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.81% | 19.25% | +58.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 74.04% | 19.25% | +54.79% |
MSOS vs. ASCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSOS has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than ASCE's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSOS vs. ASCE - Dividend Comparison
MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCE Allspring SMID Core ETF | 0.18% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSOS and ASCE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASCE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASCE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for MSOS.
ASCE has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for MSOS.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Allspring. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for MSOS and 0.38% for ASCE.
Find the right allocation for MSOS and ASCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer