MSOO vs. TSLG
MSOO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF) and TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while TSLG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSOO charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSLG.
Performance
MSOO vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSOO achieves a -26.25% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -37.23% return.
MSOO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -23.48%
- YTD
- -26.25%
- 6M
- -29.16%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLG
- 1D
- -11.63%
- 1M
- -22.10%
- YTD
- -37.23%
- 6M
- -46.41%
- 1Y
- -12.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSOO vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF | -26.25% | -61.39% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | -37.23% | 53.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSOO and TSLG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSOO vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank
MSOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSLG
MSOO vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSOO | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.05 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.23 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSOO vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSOO drawdown since its inception was -73.17%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOO and TSLG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSOO | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.17% | -82.86% | +9.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -54.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.52% | -68.29% | -3.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.41% | -58.78% | +9.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 27.68% | — |
Volatility
MSOO vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSOO | TSLG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 29.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 57.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.10% | 89.25% | -20.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.10% | 115.05% | -45.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.10% | 115.05% | -45.95% |
MSOO vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSOO has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSOO vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison
MSOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than TSLG's 10.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF | 2.20% | 1.63% |
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF | 10.43% | 6.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSOO and TSLG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for MSOO.
TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 10.43%, compared with 2.20% for MSOO.
MSOO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while TSLG is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for MSOO and 0.75% for TSLG.
Find the right allocation for MSOO and TSLG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer