MSOO vs. QMAR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSOO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF) and QMAR (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March) are both exchange-traded funds - MSOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while QMAR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSOO charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for QMAR.

Performance

MSOO vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOO achieves a -26.25% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 11.40% return.

MSOO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -23.48%
• YTD: -26.25%
• 6M: -29.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QMAR

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -0.77%
• YTD: 11.40%
• 6M: 11.38%
• 1Y: 20.76%
• 3Y*: 15.65%
• 5Y*: 11.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOO vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF	-26.25%	-61.39%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	11.40%	4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MSOO and QMAR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

MSOO vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QMAR

QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 95
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOO vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSOO	QMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.19	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.77	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.74	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	6.49	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	39.78	—

Drawdowns

MSOO vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOO drawdown since its inception was -73.17%, which is greater than QMAR's maximum drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOO and QMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSOO	QMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.17%	-19.83%	-53.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.21%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.91%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.52%	-1.65%	-69.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.41%	-3.26%	-46.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.52%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MSOO	QMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.92%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.10%	6.55%	+62.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.10%	14.01%	+55.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.10%	13.83%	+55.27%

MSOO vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOO has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSOO vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

MSOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, while QMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF	2.20%	1.63%
QMAR FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSOO and QMAR in my portfolio?

MSOO and QMAR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSOO or QMAR?

On fees, MSOO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSOO or QMAR?

MSOO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSOO or QMAR?

MSOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.00% for QMAR.

What is the main difference between MSOO and QMAR?

MSOO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QMAR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for MSOO and 0.90% for QMAR.