MSOO vs. PBFR
MSOO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF) and PBFR (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSOO charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PBFR.
Performance
MSOO vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSOO achieves a -23.81% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's 4.52% return.
MSOO
- 1D
- -6.75%
- 1M
- -28.26%
- YTD
- -23.81%
- 6M
- -38.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBFR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 5.34%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSOO vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF | -23.81% | -60.78% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 4.52% | 3.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSOO and PBFR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSOO vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank
MSOO
PBFR
MSOO vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSOO | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.99 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.13 | 1.54 | -2.67 |
Drawdowns
MSOO vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSOO drawdown since its inception was -72.39%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOO and PBFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSOO | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.39% | -8.50% | -63.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.12% | -0.16% | -69.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.41% | -0.63% | -46.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.53% | — |
Volatility
MSOO vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSOO | PBFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.25% | 4.33% | +64.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.25% | 6.89% | +62.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.25% | 6.89% | +62.36% |
MSOO vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSOO has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSOO vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison
MSOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than PBFR's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MSOO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF | 2.13% | 1.63% | 0.00% |
PBFR PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSOO and PBFR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBFR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBFR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for MSOO.
MSOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.01% for PBFR.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for MSOO and 0.50% for PBFR.
Find the right allocation for MSOO and PBFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer