PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSOO vs. PBFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSOO vs. PBFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSOO achieves a -23.81% return, which is significantly lower than PBFR's 4.52% return.


MSOO

1D
-6.75%
1M
-28.26%
YTD
-23.81%
6M
-38.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBFR

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.58%
YTD
4.52%
6M
5.34%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSOO vs. PBFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSOO and PBFR is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSOO vs. PBFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSOO

PBFR
PBFR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PBFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBFR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PBFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSOO vs. PBFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated MSTR Monthly ETF (MSOO) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF (PBFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSOO vs. PBFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSOOPBFRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.13

1.54

-2.67

Drawdowns

MSOO vs. PBFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSOO drawdown since its inception was -72.39%, which is greater than PBFR's maximum drawdown of -8.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSOO and PBFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSOOPBFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.39%

-8.50%

-63.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.12%

-0.16%

-69.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.41%

-0.63%

-46.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

Volatility

MSOO vs. PBFR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSOOPBFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.25%

4.33%

+64.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.25%

6.89%

+62.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.25%

6.89%

+62.36%

MSOO vs. PBFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSOO has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than PBFR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSOO vs. PBFR - Dividend Comparison

MSOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than PBFR's 0.01% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSOO and PBFR have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PBFR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PBFR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for MSOO.

MSOO has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.01% for PBFR.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for MSOO and 0.50% for PBFR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSOO and PBFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer