MSMR vs. DBO
MSMR (McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MSMR is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by McElhenny Sheffield, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. MSMR is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSMR returned 18.63%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for DBO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSMR charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
MSMR vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSMR achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
MSMR
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 4.65%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 25.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
MSMR vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSMR McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF | 8.50% | 17.06% | 21.58% | 18.77% | -11.88% | -1.12% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | -5.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSMR and DBO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021 | 0.04 |
The correlation between MSMR and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MSMR vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSMR
DBO
Technology
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
MSMR
DBO
-
Energy
MSMR
DBO
-
Communication Services
MSMR
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
MSMR
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
MSMR
DBO
-
Healthcare
MSMR
DBO
-
Financial Services
MSMR
DBO
Industrials
MSMR
DBO
-
Utilities
MSMR
DBO
-
Basic Materials
MSMR
DBO
-
Real Estate
MSMR
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSMR vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
MSMR
DBO
MSMR vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSMR | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 4.44 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.93 | 9.02 | +3.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSMR | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.34 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 0.02 | +1.05 |
Drawdowns
MSMR vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSMR drawdown since its inception was -14.86%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSMR and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSMR | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.86% | -90.18% | +75.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -18.19% | +11.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.84% | -28.20% | +19.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -51.38% | +51.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -62.25% | +57.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 8.92% | -6.95% |
Volatility
MSMR vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) is 2.16%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that MSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSMR | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.16% | 12.61% | -10.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.95% | 28.20% | -19.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94% | 34.46% | -22.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 32.29% | -22.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.24% | 31.78% | -21.54% |
MSMR vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSMR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSMR vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
MSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than DBO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
MSMR McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF | 1.80% | 1.51% | 2.26% | 0.81% | 0.65% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSMR and DBO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to MSMR (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSMR dropped -14.86% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 21.86% vs 18.63% for MSMR. On fees, DBO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, MSMR has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 18.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MSMR.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.80% for MSMR.
MSMR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: McElhenny Sheffield and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MSMR and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSMR and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer