PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSMR vs. ASET
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSMR vs. ASET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MSMR

1D
-0.05%
1M
4.65%
YTD
8.50%
6M
8.41%
1Y
25.41%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10Y*

ASET

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSMR vs. ASET - Yearly Performance Comparison


MSMR vs. ASET - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSMR
ASET

Technology

31.5%
0.2%

Energy

27.4%
7.8%

Communication Services

8.7%
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.4%
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

8.1%
0.1%

Healthcare

5.9%
2.2%

Financial Services

3.5%

-

Industrials

2.7%
16.3%

Utilities

2.5%
12.8%

Basic Materials

1.0%
5.8%

Real Estate

0.3%
41.6%

Technology

MSMR
31.5%
ASET
0.2%

Energy

MSMR
27.4%
ASET
7.8%

Communication Services

MSMR
8.7%
ASET
12.1%

Consumer Defensive

MSMR
8.4%
ASET
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MSMR
8.1%
ASET
0.1%

Healthcare

MSMR
5.9%
ASET
2.2%

Financial Services

MSMR
3.5%
ASET

-

Industrials

MSMR
2.7%
ASET
16.3%

Utilities

MSMR
2.5%
ASET
12.8%

Basic Materials

MSMR
1.0%
ASET
5.8%

Real Estate

MSMR
0.3%
ASET
41.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSMR vs. ASET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSMR
MSMR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ASET
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSMR vs. ASET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF (MSMR) and FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund (ASET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSMRASETDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.93

MSMR vs. ASET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSMRASETDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

Drawdowns

MSMR vs. ASET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSMR drawdown since its inception was -14.86%, which is greater than ASET's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSMR and ASET.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSMRASETDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.86%

0.00%

-14.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

0.00%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

0.00%

-5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

Volatility

MSMR vs. ASET - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSMRASETDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

0.00%

+11.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.24%

0.00%

+10.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.24%

0.00%

+10.24%

MSMR vs. ASET - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSMR has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than ASET's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSMR vs. ASET - Dividend Comparison

MSMR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while ASET has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ASET
FlexShares Real Assets Allocation Index Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSMR
McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF
1.80%1.51%2.26%0.81%0.65%0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, ASET is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASET is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MSMR.

MSMR has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.00% for ASET.

They also come from different issuers: McElhenny Sheffield and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for MSMR and 0.57% for ASET.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSMR and ASET

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer