MSJIX vs. NALFX
MSJIX (Morgan Stanley Global Endurance Portfolio) and NALFX (New Alternatives Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, MSJIX returned -8.12%/yr vs 3.35%/yr for NALFX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSJIX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for NALFX.
Performance
MSJIX vs. NALFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSJIX achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly lower than NALFX's 19.18% return.
MSJIX
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 6M
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- 17.47%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- -8.12%
- 10Y*
- —
NALFX
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 19.18%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 32.39%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
MSJIX vs. NALFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSJIX Morgan Stanley Global Endurance Portfolio | -2.07% | 24.62% | 5.99% | 72.54% | -66.23% | 9.69% | 110.10% | 34.61% |
NALFX New Alternatives Fund | 19.18% | 28.13% | -6.03% | -2.49% | -15.87% | -4.78% | 61.74% | 36.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSJIX and NALFX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2019 | 0.54 |
The correlation between MSJIX and NALFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSJIX vs. NALFX — Risk / Return Rank
MSJIX
NALFX
MSJIX vs. NALFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Global Endurance Portfolio (MSJIX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSJIX | NALFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.39 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 4.47 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.97 | 13.35 | -8.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSJIX | NALFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 2.28 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.19 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.43 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
MSJIX vs. NALFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSJIX drawdown since its inception was -75.26%, which is greater than NALFX's maximum drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSJIX and NALFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSJIX | NALFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.26% | -59.67% | -15.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -7.53% | -3.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.89% | -24.52% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.10% | -38.03% | -36.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -43.08% | -0.05% | -43.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.29% | -14.84% | -21.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 2.52% | +1.20% |
Volatility
MSJIX vs. NALFX - Volatility Comparison
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance Portfolio (MSJIX) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) at 5.44%. This indicates that MSJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NALFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSJIX | NALFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.57% | 5.44% | +2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.78% | 11.93% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 14.79% | +4.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.86% | 17.82% | +14.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.63% | 18.03% | +14.60% |
MSJIX vs. NALFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSJIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NALFX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSJIX vs. NALFX - Dividend Comparison
MSJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than NALFX's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSJIX Morgan Stanley Global Endurance Portfolio | 0.54% | 0.53% | 0.56% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 4.68% | 3.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NALFX New Alternatives Fund | 0.98% | 1.17% | 2.04% | 4.47% | 4.63% | 5.14% | 4.93% | 5.55% | 6.62% | 4.16% | 3.71% | 1.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSJIX and NALFX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSJIX has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to NALFX (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSJIX dropped -75.26% vs NALFX's -59.67%.
NALFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSJIX and NALFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer