PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSJIX vs. NALFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSJIX vs. NALFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Global Endurance Portfolio (MSJIX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSJIX achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly lower than NALFX's 19.18% return.


MSJIX

1D
-2.03%
1M
0.00%
YTD
-2.07%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
-8.12%
10Y*

NALFX

1D
1.25%
1M
3.67%
YTD
19.18%
6M
20.44%
1Y
32.39%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
10.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSJIX vs. NALFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MSJIX
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance Portfolio
-2.07%24.62%5.99%72.54%-66.23%9.69%110.10%34.61%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
19.18%28.13%-6.03%-2.49%-15.87%-4.78%61.74%36.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MSJIX and NALFX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2019

0.54

The correlation between MSJIX and NALFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSJIX vs. NALFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSJIX
MSJIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
MSJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
MSJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

NALFX
NALFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
NALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
NALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSJIX vs. NALFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Global Endurance Portfolio (MSJIX) and New Alternatives Fund (NALFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSJIXNALFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.39

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

4.47

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

13.35

-8.38

MSJIX vs. NALFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSJIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the NALFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSJIX and NALFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSJIXNALFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

2.28

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.26

0.19

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.43

-0.06

Drawdowns

MSJIX vs. NALFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSJIX drawdown since its inception was -75.26%, which is greater than NALFX's maximum drawdown of -59.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSJIX and NALFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSJIXNALFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.26%

-59.67%

-15.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-7.53%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.89%

-24.52%

-1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.10%

-38.03%

-36.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.08%

-0.05%

-43.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.29%

-14.84%

-21.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

2.52%

+1.20%

Volatility

MSJIX vs. NALFX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Global Endurance Portfolio (MSJIX) has a higher volatility of 7.57% compared to New Alternatives Fund (NALFX) at 5.44%. This indicates that MSJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NALFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSJIXNALFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

5.44%

+2.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.78%

11.93%

+2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.43%

14.79%

+4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.86%

17.82%

+14.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.63%

18.03%

+14.60%

MSJIX vs. NALFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSJIX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NALFX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSJIX vs. NALFX - Dividend Comparison

MSJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than NALFX's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSJIX
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance Portfolio
0.54%0.53%0.56%1.83%0.00%4.68%3.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NALFX
New Alternatives Fund
0.98%1.17%2.04%4.47%4.63%5.14%4.93%5.55%6.62%4.16%3.71%1.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSJIX and NALFX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSJIX has higher volatility (7.57%) compared to NALFX (5.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSJIX dropped -75.26% vs NALFX's -59.67%.

NALFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSJIX and NALFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer