MSILX vs. FAOCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MSILX (iMGP International Fund) and FAOCX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MSILX returned 6.82%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for FAOCX. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSILX charges 1.05%/yr vs 2.25%/yr for FAOCX.

Performance

MSILX vs. FAOCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iMGP International Fund (MSILX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, MSILX has outperformed FAOCX with an annualized return of 6.82%, while FAOCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.29% annualized return.

MSILX

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: 5.82%
• YTD: 9.01%
• 6M: 11.02%
• 1Y: 22.60%
• 3Y*: 13.70%
• 5Y*: 5.30%
• 10Y*: 6.82%

FAOCX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: -2.15%
• 3Y*: 7.84%
• 5Y*: 2.69%
• 10Y*: 6.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSILX vs. FAOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSILX iMGP International Fund	9.01%	30.20%	-0.58%	17.41%	-21.57%	11.82%	5.03%	29.53%	-20.24%	23.62%
FAOCX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C	0.00%	14.19%	3.86%	19.03%	-25.22%	17.97%	13.77%	26.37%	-15.77%	28.58%

Correlation

The correlation between MSILX and FAOCX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 1997	0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between MSILX and FAOCX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MSILX vs. FAOCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSILX

MSILX Risk / Return Rank: 27
MSILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
MSILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
MSILX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
MSILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
MSILX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FAOCX

FAOCX Risk / Return Rank: 1
FAOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
FAOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
FAOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
FAOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
FAOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSILX vs. FAOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP International Fund (MSILX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSILX	FAOCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	-0.34	+1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	-0.40	+2.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.94	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	-0.42	+2.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.63	-0.72	+7.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSILX vs. FAOCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSILX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the FAOCX Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSILX and FAOCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSILX	FAOCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51	-0.34	+1.84
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.17	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.38	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.25	+0.12

Drawdowns

MSILX vs. FAOCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSILX drawdown since its inception was -60.45%, roughly equal to the maximum FAOCX drawdown of -60.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSILX and FAOCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSILX	FAOCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.45%	-60.45%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.70%	-7.33%	-5.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	-14.05%	-2.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.92%	-36.96%	+2.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.23%	-36.96%	-8.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-5.90%	+5.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.79%	-15.62%	-0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	4.01%	-0.58%

Volatility

MSILX vs. FAOCX - Volatility Comparison

iMGP International Fund (MSILX) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MSILX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSILX	FAOCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	0.00%	+5.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.30%	4.07%	+8.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.15%	9.17%	+5.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.12%	16.72%	+1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.41%	16.69%	+2.72%

MSILX vs. FAOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSILX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOCX's 2.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSILX vs. FAOCX - Dividend Comparison

MSILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than FAOCX's 8.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAOCX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C	8.26%	8.26%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	2.22%	0.00%	0.51%	3.72%	3.07%	0.12%	0.00%
MSILX iMGP International Fund	1.43%	1.55%	1.24%	1.01%	0.88%	3.70%	2.23%	2.99%	0.74%	2.94%	4.15%	1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSILX and FAOCX in my portfolio?

MSILX and FAOCX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSILX or FAOCX?

MSILX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to FAOCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSILX dropped -60.45% vs FAOCX's -60.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.