MSHMX vs. MSEQX

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

MSHMX (Morgan Stanley Permanence Portfolio) and MSEQX (Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Morgan Stanley. Over the past 5 years, MSHMX returned 7.61%/yr vs -2.73%/yr for MSEQX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MSHMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for MSEQX.

Performance

MSHMX vs. MSEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Permanence Portfolio (MSHMX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSHMX achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than MSEQX's -10.17% return.

MSHMX

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: -0.15%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 1Y: 1.39%
• 3Y*: 12.07%
• 5Y*: 7.61%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.89%

MSEQX

• 1D: -1.67%
• 1M: -7.73%
• 6M: -5.09%
• YTD: -10.17%
• 1Y: -6.66%
• 3Y*: 20.41%
• 5Y*: -2.73%
• 10Y*: 15.57%
• ALL TIME*: 11.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MSEQX Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MSHMX Morgan Stanley Permanence Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MSHMX vs. MSEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MSHMX Morgan Stanley Permanence Portfolio	3.38%	18.36%	13.91%	26.50%	-20.53%	16.75%	55.45%
MSEQX Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I	-10.17%	24.78%	46.65%	50.25%	-60.18%	0.00%	119.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MSHMX and MSEQX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2020	0.78

The correlation between MSHMX and MSEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MSHMX vs. MSEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MSHMX

MSHMX Risk / Return Rank: 6
MSHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
MSHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
MSHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
MSHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MSHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

MSEQX

MSEQX Risk / Return Rank: 3
MSEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
MSEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MSEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
MSEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MSEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MSHMX vs. MSEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Permanence Portfolio (MSHMX) and Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSHMX	MSEQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.06	-0.22	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	-0.11	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	0.99	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.11	-0.24	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.29	-0.46	+0.75

MSHMX vs. MSEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSHMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is higher than the MSEQX Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSHMX and MSEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSHMX vs. MSEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSHMX drawdown since its inception was -30.20%, smaller than the maximum MSEQX drawdown of -69.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSHMX and MSEQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSHMX	MSEQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.20%	-69.48%	+39.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.64%	-27.73%	+17.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.85%	-32.52%	+15.67%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.20%	-69.48%	+39.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-69.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.93%	-21.53%	+17.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-16.90%	+10.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	14.33%	-10.21%

Volatility

MSHMX vs. MSEQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Morgan Stanley Permanence Portfolio (MSHMX) is 4.39%, while Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I (MSEQX) has a volatility of 7.02%. This indicates that MSHMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSHMX	MSEQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	7.02%	-2.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.80%	22.90%	-8.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.59%	29.61%	-11.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.97%	39.91%	-19.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.92%	33.92%	-14.00%

MSHMX vs. MSEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSHMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MSEQX's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSHMX vs. MSEQX - Dividend Comparison

MSHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.78%, while MSEQX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MSEQX Morgan Stanley Growth Portfolio Class I	0.00%	0.00%	0.55%	0.00%	16.79%	24.24%	9.36%	21.39%	5.38%	21.18%	12.71%	7.55%
MSHMX Morgan Stanley Permanence Portfolio	15.78%	16.31%	14.39%	10.11%	2.76%	18.17%	5.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSHMX and MSEQX in my portfolio?

MSHMX and MSEQX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSHMX or MSEQX?

MSEQX has higher volatility (7.02%) compared to MSHMX (4.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSHMX dropped -30.20% vs MSEQX's -69.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.