MSHE.TO vs. USCL.TO
MSHE.TO (Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and USCL.TO (Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSHE.TO returned -8.22% vs 29.89% for USCL.TO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MSHE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for USCL.TO.
Performance
MSHE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSHE.TO achieves a -13.46% return, which is significantly lower than USCL.TO's 11.57% return.
MSHE.TO
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- -13.46%
- 6M
- -13.17%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCL.TO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 29.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSHE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -13.46% | 8.80% | 5.80% |
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 11.57% | 10.03% | 14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSHE.TO and USCL.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between MSHE.TO and USCL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSHE.TO vs. USCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MSHE.TO
USCL.TO
MSHE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSHE.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.49 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 3.51 | -3.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 14.29 | -14.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSHE.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 2.55 | -2.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 1.42 | -1.43 |
Drawdowns
MSHE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, which is greater than USCL.TO's maximum drawdown of -21.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSHE.TO and USCL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSHE.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.62% | -21.85% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.62% | -8.56% | -29.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.77% | -0.08% | -23.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -2.55% | -8.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | 2.10% | +16.26% |
Volatility
MSHE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) at 2.86%. This indicates that MSHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSHE.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 2.86% | +8.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.57% | 9.31% | +15.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.13% | 11.79% | +15.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 15.44% | +12.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 15.44% | +12.83% |
MSHE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USCL.TO's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSHE.TO vs. USCL.TO - Dividend Comparison
MSHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.77%, more than USCL.TO's 11.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 21.77% | 17.17% | 5.28% | 0.00% |
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 11.95% | 12.94% | 11.57% | 7.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSHE.TO and USCL.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USCL.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USCL.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MSHE.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MSHE.TO and 0.04% for USCL.TO.
Find the right allocation for MSHE.TO and USCL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer