USCL.TO vs. VFV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO).
USCL.TO and VFV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. USCL.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jul 5, 2023. VFV.TO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2012.
Performance
USCL.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USCL.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | -5.43% | 10.03% | 38.54% | 4.33% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | -3.12% | 12.18% | 35.23% | 7.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USCL.TO achieves a -5.43% return, which is significantly lower than VFV.TO's -3.12% return.
USCL.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -5.43%
- 6M
- -3.57%
- 1Y
- 8.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFV.TO
- 1D
- 2.76%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -3.12%
- 6M
- -1.94%
- 1Y
- 13.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USCL.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
USCL.TO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
USCL.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
USCL.TO
VFV.TO
USCL.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USCL.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 0.75 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.76 | 1.13 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.18 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 1.19 | -0.52 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | 4.51 | -1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USCL.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.75 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 1.07 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between USCL.TO and VFV.TO is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
USCL.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
USCL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.76%, more than VFV.TO's 0.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 13.76% | 12.94% | 11.57% | 7.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.96% | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.66% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
USCL.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USCL.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.85%, smaller than the maximum VFV.TO drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCL.TO and VFV.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USCL.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -27.43% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.94% | -12.52% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.56% | -6.10% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.66% | -3.39% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 3.29% | +0.34% |
Volatility
USCL.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) have volatilities of 5.13% and 5.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USCL.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 5.12% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 9.27% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.04% | 18.28% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 14.92% | +0.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 16.57% | -0.95% |