MSHE.TO vs. HHIC.TO
MSHE.TO (Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and HHIC.TO (Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSHE.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while HHIC.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
MSHE.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSHE.TO achieves a -13.46% return, which is significantly lower than HHIC.TO's 13.62% return.
MSHE.TO
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- -13.46%
- 6M
- -13.17%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HHIC.TO
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 13.62%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSHE.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -13.46% | -4.25% |
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF | 13.62% | 16.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSHE.TO and HHIC.TO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSHE.TO vs. HHIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MSHE.TO
HHIC.TO
MSHE.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) and Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSHE.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSHE.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 2.57 | -2.58 |
Drawdowns
MSHE.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, which is greater than HHIC.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSHE.TO and HHIC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSHE.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.62% | -7.26% | -30.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.77% | -0.83% | -22.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -1.47% | -9.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | — | — |
Volatility
MSHE.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSHE.TO | HHIC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.13% | 16.67% | +10.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 16.67% | +11.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 16.67% | +11.60% |
MSHE.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSHE.TO and HHIC.TO have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
MSHE.TO vs. HHIC.TO - Dividend Comparison
MSHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.77%, more than HHIC.TO's 10.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HHIC.TO Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF | 10.90% | 4.77% | 0.00% |
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 21.77% | 17.17% | 5.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSHE.TO and HHIC.TO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSHE.TO and HHIC.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
MSHE.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HHIC.TO is Canada Equities.
Find the right allocation for MSHE.TO and HHIC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer