PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HHIC.TO vs. QDAY.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HHIC.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HHIC.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HHIC.TO achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly higher than QDAY.NEO's -13.08% return.


HHIC.TO

1D
0.77%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
9.05%
6M
15.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDAY.NEO

1D
3.19%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
-13.08%
6M
-15.85%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HHIC.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HHIC.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HHIC.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Canadian High Income Shares ETF (HHIC.TO) and Hamilton EnhancedTechnology DayMAX™ ETF (QDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HHIC.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HHIC.TOQDAY.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.79

-0.31

+3.10

Correlation

The correlation between HHIC.TO and QDAY.NEO is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HHIC.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison

HHIC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.85%, more than QDAY.NEO's 5.46% yield.


Drawdowns

HHIC.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HHIC.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.26%, smaller than the maximum QDAY.NEO drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HHIC.TO and QDAY.NEO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HHIC.TOQDAY.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-25.46%

+18.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-23.08%

+18.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-7.89%

+6.58%

Volatility

HHIC.TO vs. QDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HHIC.TOQDAY.NEODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.25%

23.27%

-6.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

23.27%

-6.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

23.27%

-6.02%