MSHE.TO vs. JEPI.TO
MSHE.TO (Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units) and JEPI.TO (JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSHE.TO returned -8.22% vs 9.33% for JEPI.TO. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSHE.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPI.TO.
Performance
MSHE.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSHE.TO achieves a -13.46% return, which is significantly lower than JEPI.TO's 1.48% return.
MSHE.TO
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 6.93%
- YTD
- -13.46%
- 6M
- -13.17%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPI.TO
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 9.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSHE.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | -13.46% | 8.80% | 7.53% |
JEPI.TO JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 1.48% | 3.09% | 7.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSHE.TO and JEPI.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.29 |
The correlation between MSHE.TO and JEPI.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSHE.TO vs. JEPI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MSHE.TO
JEPI.TO
MSHE.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) and JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSHE.TO | JEPI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.17 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | 1.76 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.45 | 4.49 | -4.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSHE.TO | JEPI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 0.94 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | 0.56 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
MSHE.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSHE.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, which is greater than JEPI.TO's maximum drawdown of -14.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSHE.TO and JEPI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSHE.TO | JEPI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.62% | -14.36% | -23.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.62% | -5.32% | -32.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.77% | -3.06% | -20.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -3.38% | -7.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.36% | 2.08% | +16.28% |
Volatility
MSHE.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (MSHE.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.24% compared to JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPI.TO) at 2.14%. This indicates that MSHE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSHE.TO | JEPI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 2.14% | +9.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.57% | 7.68% | +16.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.13% | 9.92% | +17.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 12.92% | +15.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.27% | 12.92% | +15.35% |
MSHE.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSHE.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPI.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSHE.TO vs. JEPI.TO - Dividend Comparison
MSHE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.77%, more than JEPI.TO's 7.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPI.TO JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active ETF | 7.90% | 7.56% | 3.91% |
MSHE.TO Harvest Microsoft Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units | 21.77% | 17.17% | 5.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSHE.TO and JEPI.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPI.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPI.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MSHE.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Harvest and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MSHE.TO and 0.35% for JEPI.TO.
Find the right allocation for MSHE.TO and JEPI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer