PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSGM vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSGM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motorsport Games Inc. (MSGM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSGM achieves a 40.38% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.45% return.


MSGM

1D
-3.47%
1M
2.06%
6M
26.42%
YTD
40.38%
1Y
38.11%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
-49.01%
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.77%
1M
1.25%
6M
8.34%
YTD
10.45%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
20.16%
5Y*
13.01%
10Y*
15.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSGM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MSGM
Motorsport Games Inc.
40.38%136.57%-56.63%-25.54%-87.79%-90.29%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.45%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%27.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MSGM and VOO is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2021

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSGM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSGM
MSGM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MSGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSGM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MSGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSGM Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSGM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motorsport Games Inc. (MSGM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSGMVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.31

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

2.43

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.44

10.60

-9.16

MSGM vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSGM Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSGM and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSGM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSGM drawdown since its inception was -99.77%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSGM and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSGMVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.77%

-33.99%

-65.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.16%

-8.90%

-39.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.56%

-18.69%

-68.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.47%

-24.52%

-74.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.73%

-1.11%

-97.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.41%

-3.68%

-86.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.53%

2.04%

+24.49%

Volatility

MSGM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Motorsport Games Inc. (MSGM) has a higher volatility of 22.52% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.16%. This indicates that MSGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSGMVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.52%

4.16%

+18.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

56.00%

9.97%

+46.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

117.99%

12.53%

+105.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

352.33%

16.93%

+335.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

336.70%

18.00%

+318.70%

Dividends

MSGM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MSGM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSGM
Motorsport Games Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.07%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSGM and VOO have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSGM has higher volatility (22.52%) compared to VOO (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSGM dropped -99.77% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSGM and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer