MSFY vs. TSLP
MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) and TSLP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFY returned -7.25% vs 15.63% for TSLP. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFY charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSLP.
Performance
MSFY vs. TSLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFY achieves a -13.99% return, which is significantly lower than TSLP's -8.72% return.
MSFY
- 1D
- -3.43%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- -13.99%
- 6M
- -12.67%
- 1Y
- -7.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- -8.72%
- 6M
- -8.30%
- 1Y
- 15.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFY vs. TSLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | -13.99% | 14.11% | 10.88% | 2.57% |
TSLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF | -8.72% | 9.77% | 41.53% | 12.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFY and TSLP is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.32 |
The correlation between MSFY and TSLP shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFY vs. TSLP — Risk / Return Rank
MSFY
TSLP
MSFY vs. TSLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFY | TSLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.10 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 0.49 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 1.20 | -1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFY | TSLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 | 0.37 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.46 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
MSFY vs. TSLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFY drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, smaller than the maximum TSLP drawdown of -46.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFY and TSLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFY | TSLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.21% | -46.00% | +11.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.21% | -32.00% | -2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.53% | -15.68% | -4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -15.73% | +8.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.40% | 13.16% | +2.24% |
Volatility
MSFY vs. TSLP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) is 10.84%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF (TSLP) has a volatility of 12.75%. This indicates that MSFY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFY | TSLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 12.75% | -1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.02% | 28.48% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.51% | 42.87% | -16.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 48.60% | -26.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.27% | 48.60% | -26.33% |
MSFY vs. TSLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFY has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLP's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFY vs. TSLP - Dividend Comparison
MSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.31%, less than TSLP's 30.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | 24.31% | 18.56% | 14.35% | 1.94% |
TSLP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Tesla ETF | 30.32% | 31.05% | 21.82% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFY and TSLP have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLP has higher volatility (12.75%) compared to MSFY (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFY dropped -34.21% vs TSLP's -46.00%.
On 1-year performance, TSLP leads with 15.63% vs -7.25% for MSFY. On fees, TSLP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, MSFY has been the lower-risk option at 10.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLP has performed better with a 15.63% return vs -7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for MSFY.
TSLP has the higher dividend yield at 30.32%, compared with 24.31% for MSFY.
Their fees differ too: 1.00% for MSFY and 0.99% for TSLP.
TSLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFY and TSLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer