PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFY vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFY vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFY achieves a -23.61% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 640.02% return.


MSFY

1D
-1.54%
1M
-1.44%
6M
-21.21%
YTD
-23.61%
1Y
-23.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
9.50%
1M
-10.60%
6M
441.55%
YTD
640.02%
1Y
3,397.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFY vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSFY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF
-23.61%14.11%2.69%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
640.02%599.03%-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFY and MUU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.25

The correlation between MSFY and MUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFY vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFY
MSFY Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
MSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFY vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFYMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-30.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.73

-0.86

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

81.19

-81.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

269.76

-271.04

MSFY vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFY Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 29.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFY and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFY vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFY drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFY and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFYMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.65%

-75.07%

+39.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.65%

-52.72%

+17.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.42%

-30.27%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-23.44%

+15.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.11%

16.68%

+1.43%

Volatility

MSFY vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) is 11.85%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.96%. This indicates that MSFY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFYMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.85%

67.96%

-56.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.41%

115.39%

-87.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.09%

145.68%

-116.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.12%

138.08%

-114.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.12%

138.08%

-114.96%

MSFY vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFY has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFY vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

MSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.91%, more than MUU's 0.64% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSFY
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF
25.91%18.56%14.35%1.94%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.64%4.27%0.31%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFY and MUU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (67.96%) compared to MSFY (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFY dropped -35.65% vs MUU's -75.07%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3397.63% vs -23.16% for MSFY. On fees, MSFY is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, MSFY has been the lower-risk option at 11.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3397.63% return vs -23.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSFY is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

MSFY has the higher dividend yield at 25.91%, compared with 0.64% for MUU.

MSFY is categorized as Derivative Income, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for MSFY and 1.01% for MUU.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (29.47 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFY and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer