MSFY vs. FXU
MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) and FXU (First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while FXU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the StrataQuant Utilities Index. MSFY is actively managed, while FXU is passively managed. Over the past year, MSFY returned -18.07% vs 17.67% for FXU. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFY charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FXU.
Performance
MSFY vs. FXU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFY achieves a -22.50% return, which is significantly lower than FXU's 8.19% return.
MSFY
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- -22.50%
- 6M
- -21.30%
- 1Y
- -18.07%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FXU
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
MSFY vs. FXU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | -22.50% | 14.11% | 10.88% | 2.57% |
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | 8.19% | 21.86% | 22.50% | 6.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFY and FXU is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFY vs. FXU — Risk / Return Rank
MSFY
FXU
MSFY vs. FXU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFY | FXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.21 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | 1.93 | -2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 5.17 | -6.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFY vs. FXU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFY drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, smaller than the maximum FXU drawdown of -49.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFY and FXU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFY | FXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.21% | -49.00% | +14.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.21% | -8.63% | -25.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.39% | -5.57% | -22.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -7.63% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.96% | 3.22% | +12.74% |
Volatility
MSFY vs. FXU - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) has a higher volatility of 11.56% compared to First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund (FXU) at 5.01%. This indicates that MSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFY | FXU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.56% | 5.01% | +6.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.20% | 10.33% | +14.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.90% | 13.30% | +13.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 16.61% | +5.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 18.34% | +3.99% |
MSFY vs. FXU - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFY has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FXU's 0.62% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFY vs. FXU - Dividend Comparison
MSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.99%, more than FXU's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXU First Trust Utilities AlphaDEX Fund | 2.16% | 2.29% | 2.41% | 2.52% | 2.03% | 2.00% | 3.97% | 2.34% | 2.40% | 3.81% | 2.62% | 3.90% |
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF | 26.99% | 18.56% | 14.35% | 1.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFY and FXU have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFY has higher volatility (11.56%) compared to FXU (5.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFY dropped -34.21% vs FXU's -49.00%.
On 1-year performance, FXU leads with 17.67% vs -18.07% for MSFY. On fees, FXU is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, FXU has been the lower-risk option at 5.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FXU has performed better with a 17.67% return vs -18.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FXU is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for MSFY.
MSFY has the higher dividend yield at 26.99%, compared with 2.16% for FXU.
MSFY is categorized as Derivative Income, while FXU is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for MSFY and 0.62% for FXU.
FXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFY and FXU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer