MSFY vs. BAMU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFY returned -23.06% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. MSFY charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

MSFY vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFY achieves a -25.63% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.18% return.

MSFY

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -11.80%
• YTD: -25.63%
• 6M: -25.98%
• 1Y: -23.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 1.18%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFY vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF	-25.63%	14.11%	10.88%	2.57%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.18%	3.21%	4.14%	0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFY and BAMU is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023	-0.02

The correlation between MSFY and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MSFY vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFY

MSFY Risk / Return Rank: 3
MSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
MSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
MSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 98
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFY vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSFY	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	4.94	-5.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.04	8.71	-9.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	2.41	-1.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.68	24.37	-25.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.39	96.52	-97.91

MSFY vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFY Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFY and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSFY vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFY drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFY and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFY	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.21%	-0.36%	-33.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.21%	-0.12%	-34.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.29%	0.00%	-31.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.59%	-0.02%	-7.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.62%	0.03%	+16.59%

Volatility

MSFY vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) has a higher volatility of 12.22% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.09%. This indicates that MSFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFY	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.22%	0.09%	+12.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.76%	0.39%	+25.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.53%	0.58%	+26.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.54%	0.87%	+21.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.54%	0.87%	+21.67%

MSFY vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFY has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFY vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

MSFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.13%, more than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF	28.13%	18.56%	14.35%	1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSFY and BAMU in my portfolio?

MSFY and BAMU have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSFY or BAMU?

MSFY has higher volatility (12.22%) compared to BAMU (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFY dropped -34.21% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, MSFY or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.87% vs -23.06% for MSFY. On fees, MSFY is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSFY or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.87% return vs -23.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSFY or BAMU?

MSFY is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSFY or BAMU?

MSFY has the higher dividend yield at 28.13%, compared with 3.05% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between MSFY and BAMU?

MSFY is categorized as Derivative Income, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for MSFY and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.