MSFY.L vs. JEPQ.L
MSFY.L (IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP) and JEPQ.L (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFY.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while JEPQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. MSFY.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.L.
Performance
MSFY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSFY.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.L
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- YTD
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 17.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFY.L vs. JEPQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSFY.L
JEPQ.L
MSFY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP (MSFY.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFY.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.50 | — |
Drawdowns
MSFY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFY.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -20.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.43% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.20% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.31% | — |
Volatility
MSFY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFY.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.48% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.21% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 16.21% | — |
MSFY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFY.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Dividend Comparison
MSFY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.54% |
MSFY.L IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, JEPQ.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPQ.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MSFY.L.
MSFY.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ.L is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MSFY.L and 0.35% for JEPQ.L.
Find the right allocation for MSFY.L and JEPQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer