MSFY.L vs. JEIP.L
MSFY.L (IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP) and JEIP.L (JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. MSFY.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEIP.L.
Performance
MSFY.L vs. JEIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MSFY.L is traded in USD, while JEIP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JEIP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
MSFY.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEIP.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 8.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFY.L vs. JEIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSFY.L
JEIP.L
MSFY.L vs. JEIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP (MSFY.L) and JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist (JEIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFY.L | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.53 | — |
Drawdowns
MSFY.L vs. JEIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFY.L | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -31.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -17.27% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -20.17% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.00% | — |
Volatility
MSFY.L vs. JEIP.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFY.L | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.90% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.15% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 7.98% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 20.86% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 20.86% | — |
MSFY.L vs. JEIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFY.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JEIP.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFY.L vs. JEIP.L - Dividend Comparison
MSFY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEIP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEIP.L JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist | 8.25% | 7.18% | 0.61% |
MSFY.L IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, JEIP.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEIP.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for MSFY.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MSFY.L and 0.35% for JEIP.L.
Find the right allocation for MSFY.L and JEIP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer