PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
MSFY.L vs. CEGI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

MSFY.L vs. CEGI.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MSFY.L (IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP) and CEGI.L (REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. MSFY.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CEGI.L.

Performance

MSFY.L vs. CEGI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP (MSFY.L) and REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing (CEGI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

MSFY.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

CEGI.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP

REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing

Often compared with MSFY.L:
MSFY.L vs. QQQO.LMSFY.L vs. TSLI.LMSFY.L vs. 3QQQ.LMSFY.L vs. MAG7.LMSFY.L vs. MSFYMSFY.L vs. SOXL.LMSFY.L vs. JEPE.L
Often compared with CEGI.L:
CEGI.L vs. JEGA.LCEGI.L vs. GOOI.LCEGI.L vs. GLDE.LCEGI.L vs. BTC-USDCEGI.L vs. SPYY.LCEGI.L vs. SPYO.LCEGI.L vs. JEPI.L

Return for Risk

MSFY.L vs. CEGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Microsoft (MSFT) Options ETP (MSFY.L) and REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing (CEGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSFY.L vs. CEGI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFY.L vs. CEGI.L - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility

MSFY.L vs. CEGI.L - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

MSFY.L vs. CEGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFY.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CEGI.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

MSFY.L vs. CEGI.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSFY.L nor CEGI.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

On fees, MSFY.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSFY.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CEGI.L.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for MSFY.L and 0.65% for CEGI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFY.L and CEGI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer