MSFU vs. TSMX
MSFU (Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares) and TSMX (Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. MSFU is passively managed, while TSMX is actively managed. Over the past year, MSFU returned -21.45% vs 324.82% for TSMX. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSFU charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSMX.
Performance
MSFU vs. TSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -22.90% return, which is significantly lower than TSMX's 94.10% return.
MSFU
- 1D
- -8.36%
- 1M
- 12.13%
- YTD
- -22.90%
- 6M
- -25.88%
- 1Y
- -21.45%
- 3Y*
- 1.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMX
- 1D
- 4.81%
- 1M
- 23.50%
- YTD
- 94.10%
- 6M
- 108.35%
- 1Y
- 324.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFU vs. TSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares | -22.90% | 13.36% | -0.85% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 94.10% | 81.48% | 14.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFU and TSMX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024 | 0.37 |
The correlation between MSFU and TSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MSFU vs. TSMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MSFU
TSMX
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
MSFU
TSMX
Basic Materials
MSFU
-
TSMX
-
Communication Services
MSFU
-
TSMX
-
Consumer Cyclical
MSFU
-
TSMX
-
Consumer Defensive
MSFU
-
TSMX
-
Energy
MSFU
-
TSMX
-
Financial Services
MSFU
-
TSMX
-
Healthcare
MSFU
-
TSMX
-
Industrials
MSFU
-
TSMX
-
Real Estate
MSFU
-
TSMX
-
Utilities
MSFU
-
TSMX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFU vs. TSMX — Risk / Return Rank
MSFU
TSMX
MSFU vs. TSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFU | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | 4.58 | -5.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | 3.97 | -4.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.48 | -0.52 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 9.49 | -9.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.67 | 31.06 | -31.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFU | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 | 4.58 | -5.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 1.65 | -1.42 |
Drawdowns
MSFU vs. TSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, smaller than the maximum TSMX drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and TSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFU | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.83% | -63.80% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.83% | -34.93% | -24.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.32% | 0.00% | -40.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.48% | -15.88% | -0.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.83% | 10.67% | +20.16% |
Volatility
MSFU vs. TSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) is 18.49%, while Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX) has a volatility of 22.31%. This indicates that MSFU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFU | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.49% | 22.31% | -3.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.94% | 54.31% | -9.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.77% | 71.46% | -21.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.23% | 80.94% | -34.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.23% | 80.94% | -34.71% |
MSFU vs. TSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFU vs. TSMX - Dividend Comparison
MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than TSMX's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares | 10.26% | 8.15% | 7.00% | 2.11% | 0.54% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 4.25% | 8.01% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFU and TSMX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMX has higher volatility (22.31%) compared to MSFU (18.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFU dropped -59.83% vs TSMX's -63.80%.
On 1-year performance, TSMX leads with 324.82% vs -21.45% for MSFU. On fees, MSFU is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, MSFU has been the lower-risk option at 18.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMX has performed better with a 324.82% return vs -21.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSFU is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSMX.
MSFU has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 4.25% for TSMX.
Their fees differ too: 1.04% for MSFU and 1.05% for TSMX.
TSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.58 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFU and TSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer