PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFU vs. QQQE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFU vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -22.90% return, which is significantly lower than QQQE's 19.23% return.


MSFU

1D
-8.36%
1M
12.13%
YTD
-22.90%
6M
-25.88%
1Y
-21.45%
3Y*
1.80%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQE

1D
0.66%
1M
10.35%
YTD
19.23%
6M
18.90%
1Y
30.11%
3Y*
18.73%
5Y*
10.69%
10Y*
15.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFU vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MSFU
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares
-22.90%13.36%5.80%83.04%-13.28%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
19.23%14.58%6.98%33.76%-3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFU and QQQE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022

0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between MSFU and QQQE has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MSFU vs. QQQE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSFU
QQQE

Technology

100.0%
45.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.9%

Communication Services

-

9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

2.0%

Financial Services

-

1.0%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Industrials

-

10.1%

Real Estate

-

0.7%

Utilities

-

3.9%

Technology

MSFU
100.0%
QQQE
45.1%

Basic Materials

MSFU

-

QQQE
0.9%

Communication Services

MSFU

-

QQQE
9.1%

Consumer Cyclical

MSFU

-

QQQE
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

MSFU

-

QQQE
7.7%

Energy

MSFU

-

QQQE
2.0%

Financial Services

MSFU

-

QQQE
1.0%

Healthcare

MSFU

-

QQQE
8.6%

Industrials

MSFU

-

QQQE
10.1%

Real Estate

MSFU

-

QQQE
0.7%

Utilities

MSFU

-

QQQE
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFU vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFU
MSFU Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MSFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFU Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQE
QQQE Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQE Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFU vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFUQQQEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.43

2.14

-2.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.30

2.91

-3.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.36

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

3.29

-3.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.67

11.39

-12.06

MSFU vs. QQQE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFU Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the QQQE Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFU and QQQE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFUQQQEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

2.14

-2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.77

-0.53

Drawdowns

MSFU vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and QQQE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFUQQQEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.83%

-32.14%

-27.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.83%

-9.41%

-50.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-59.83%

-21.38%

-38.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.32%

0.00%

-40.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.48%

-5.17%

-11.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.83%

2.72%

+28.11%

Volatility

MSFU vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) has a higher volatility of 18.49% compared to Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) at 3.81%. This indicates that MSFU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFUQQQEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.49%

3.81%

+14.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.94%

10.65%

+34.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.77%

14.16%

+35.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.23%

20.31%

+25.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.23%

20.73%

+25.50%

MSFU vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFU vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison

MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than QQQE's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFU
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares
10.26%8.15%7.00%2.11%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQE
Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares
0.52%0.52%0.86%0.79%0.98%3.83%0.54%0.74%0.80%0.65%1.17%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFU and QQQE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFU has higher volatility (18.49%) compared to QQQE (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFU dropped -59.83% vs QQQE's -32.14%.

On 3-year performance, QQQE leads with 18.73% vs 1.80% for MSFU. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QQQE has performed better with a 18.73% return vs 1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for MSFU.

MSFU has the higher dividend yield at 10.26%, compared with 0.52% for QQQE.

MSFU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. MSFU tracks Microsoft Corporation (150%), while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for MSFU and 0.35% for QQQE.

QQQE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFU and QQQE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer