MSFU vs. NVDL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL).

MSFU and NVDL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MSFU is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Microsoft Corporation (150%). It was launched on Sep 6, 2022. NVDL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Dec 13, 2022.

Performance

MSFU vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MSFU vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	-44.20%	13.36%	5.80%	83.04%	-10.32%
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	-17.54%	32.57%	344.58%	432.18%	-28.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFU achieves a -44.20% return, which is significantly lower than NVDL's -17.54% return.

MSFU

• 1D: 6.23%
• 1M: -12.32%
• YTD: -44.20%
• 6M: -52.96%
• 1Y: -16.87%
• 3Y*: -1.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDL

• 1D: 11.18%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: -17.54%
• 6M: -22.48%
• 1Y: 94.04%
• 3Y*: 117.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFU vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFU has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NVDL's 1.15% expense ratio.

NVDL

GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF

MSFU

Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares

Return for Risk

MSFU vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFU

MSFU Risk / Return Rank: 7
MSFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
MSFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
MSFU Omega Ratio Rank: 8
MSFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
MSFU Martin Ratio Rank: 6

NVDL

NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 71
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 69
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFU vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSFU	NVDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.32	1.16	-1.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.12	1.91	-2.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.24	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	2.15	-2.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.78	5.21	-5.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSFU vs. NVDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFU Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the NVDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFU and NVDL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSFU	NVDL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32	1.16	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	1.58	-1.54

Correlation

The correlation between MSFU and NVDL is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MSFU vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison

MSFU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.18%, while NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MSFU Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares	14.18%	8.15%	7.00%	2.11%	0.54%
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.29%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MSFU vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFU drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, smaller than the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFU and NVDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSFU	NVDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.83%	-67.55%	+7.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.83%	-42.23%	-17.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.80%	-35.77%	-21.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.00%	-17.03%	+2.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.86%	17.47%	+6.39%

Volatility

MSFU vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X Shares (MSFU) is 13.10%, while GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) has a volatility of 20.68%. This indicates that MSFU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSFU	NVDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.10%	20.68%	-7.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.28%	51.65%	-12.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.78%	81.88%	-29.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.15%	91.18%	-46.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.15%	91.18%	-46.03%