PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFT vs. SHIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSFT vs. SHIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -18.85% return, which is significantly lower than SHIP's 82.14% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFT has outperformed SHIP with an annualized return of 24.39%, while SHIP has yielded a comparatively lower -41.99% annualized return.


MSFT

1D
0.10%
1M
-7.19%
YTD
-18.85%
6M
-17.98%
1Y
-17.07%
3Y*
6.16%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
24.39%

SHIP

1D
6.03%
1M
4.29%
YTD
82.14%
6M
73.58%
1Y
151.48%
3Y*
65.24%
5Y*
14.64%
10Y*
-41.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFT vs. SHIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
-18.85%15.58%12.93%58.19%-28.02%52.48%42.53%57.56%20.80%40.73%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
82.14%38.48%-3.81%61.04%-36.53%70.83%-93.89%-92.71%-51.66%-9.57%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFT and SHIP is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2007

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSFT:

$2.91T

SHIP:

$345.21M

EPS

MSFT:

$16.79

SHIP:

$1.00

PE Ratio

MSFT:

23.27

SHIP:

16.52

PEG Ratio

MSFT:

1.63

SHIP:

0.05

PS Ratio

MSFT:

9.16

SHIP:

2.16

PB Ratio

MSFT:

7.02

SHIP:

1.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSFT:

$318.27B

SHIP:

$158.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSFT:

$217.41B

SHIP:

$62.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

MSFT:

$200.96B

SHIP:

$78.01M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFT vs. SHIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFT
MSFT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MSFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SHIP
SHIP Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SHIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SHIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFT vs. SHIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFTSHIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.50

-0.61

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.53

8.33

-8.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.08

20.43

-21.51

MSFT vs. SHIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the SHIP Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFT and SHIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFT vs. SHIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, smaller than the maximum SHIP drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and SHIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFTSHIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.38%

-100.00%

+30.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.91%

-18.56%

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.91%

-57.61%

+23.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.15%

-69.11%

+31.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

-99.98%

+62.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.46%

-99.98%

+72.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.78%

-86.56%

+64.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.48%

7.55%

+8.93%

Volatility

MSFT vs. SHIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is 10.52%, while Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) has a volatility of 16.12%. This indicates that MSFT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFTSHIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.52%

16.12%

-5.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.31%

33.91%

-11.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.42%

42.69%

-17.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.66%

51.91%

-25.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.06%

98.54%

-71.48%

Dividends

MSFT vs. SHIP - Dividend Comparison

MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than SHIP's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.91%0.70%0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
2.60%3.58%10.58%1.28%25.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MSFT vs. SHIP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microsoft Corporation and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
82.89B
49.42M
(MSFT) Total Revenue
(SHIP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MSFT vs. SHIP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Microsoft Corporation and Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
67.6%
51.8%
Portfolio components
MSFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a gross profit of 56.06B and revenue of 82.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

SHIP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 25.59M and revenue of 49.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

MSFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported an operating income of 38.40B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

SHIP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 18.53M and revenue of 49.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.5%.

MSFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Microsoft Corporation reported a net income of 31.78B and revenue of 82.89B, resulting in a net margin of 38.3%.

SHIP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 12.31M and revenue of 49.42M, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSFT and SHIP have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHIP has higher volatility (16.12%) compared to MSFT (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs SHIP's -100.00%.

SHIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFT and SHIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer