MSFT vs. QQQM
MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, MSFT returned 11.09%/yr vs 17.06%/yr for QQQM. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MSFT vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT achieves a -14.48% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 16.72% return.
MSFT
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- -14.48%
- 6M
- -15.77%
- 1Y
- -11.77%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.64%
QQQM
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 16.72%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 35.86%
- 3Y*
- 27.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.06%
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -14.48% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -28.02% | 52.48% | 0.06% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 16.72% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT and QQQM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MSFT and QQQM has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT
QQQM
MSFT vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.38 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 3.01 | -3.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 11.44 | -12.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | 2.16 | -2.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.77 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.80 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
MSFT vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT drawdown since its inception was -69.38%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.38% | -35.04% | -34.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.91% | -11.96% | -21.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.91% | -22.70% | -11.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.15% | -35.04% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.56% | -4.04% | -19.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.78% | -8.24% | -13.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.13% | 3.14% | +12.99% |
Volatility
MSFT vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a higher volatility of 10.25% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 6.83%. This indicates that MSFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.25% | 6.83% | +3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.36% | 13.15% | +9.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.31% | 16.70% | +8.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.64% | 22.34% | +4.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.06% | 22.20% | +4.86% |
Dividends
MSFT vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, more than QQQM's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.86% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.43% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFT and QQQM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to QQQM (6.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFT dropped -69.38% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFT and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer