MSFT.NEO vs. IREN
MSFT.NEO (Microsoft Corp CDR) and IREN (IREN Limited) are both stocks. MSFT.NEO operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while IREN operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, MSFT.NEO returned 4.13%/yr vs 165.86%/yr for IREN. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSFT.NEO vs. IREN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MSFT.NEO is traded in CAD, while IREN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IREN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFT.NEO achieves a -17.91% return, which is significantly lower than IREN's 64.27% return.
MSFT.NEO
- 1D
- 2.25%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- -17.91%
- 6M
- -16.55%
- 1Y
- -17.17%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IREN
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- 16.95%
- YTD
- 64.27%
- 6M
- 73.94%
- 1Y
- 535.74%
- 3Y*
- 165.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT.NEO vs. IREN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFT.NEO Microsoft Corp CDR | -17.91% | 12.61% | 11.26% | 56.34% | -29.26% | -0.97% |
IREN IREN Limited | 64.27% | 267.06% | 48.97% | 458.39% | -91.78% | -41.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFT.NEO and IREN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.27 |
The correlation between MSFT.NEO and IREN shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MSFT.NEO:
$14.11
IREN:
$0.45
MSFT.NEO:
1.43
IREN:
134.19
MSFT.NEO:
0.51
IREN:
13.63
MSFT.NEO:
$293.81B
IREN:
$757.07M
MSFT.NEO:
$202.04B
IREN:
$433.88M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFT.NEO vs. IREN — Risk / Return Rank
MSFT.NEO
IREN
MSFT.NEO vs. IREN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) and IREN Limited (IREN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFT.NEO | IREN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.44 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 9.13 | -9.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 16.99 | -17.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFT.NEO vs. IREN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFT.NEO drawdown since its inception was -37.95%, smaller than the maximum IREN drawdown of -95.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFT.NEO and IREN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFT.NEO | IREN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.95% | -95.93% | +57.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.54% | -59.21% | +24.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.54% | -65.03% | +30.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.08% | -21.14% | -5.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.46% | -63.95% | +51.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.18% | 31.75% | -14.57% |
Volatility
MSFT.NEO vs. IREN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Microsoft Corp CDR (MSFT.NEO) is 10.69%, while IREN Limited (IREN) has a volatility of 33.63%. This indicates that MSFT.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IREN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFT.NEO | IREN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.69% | 33.63% | -22.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.31% | 76.03% | -53.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.27% | 103.30% | -78.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 118.41% | -91.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 118.41% | -91.24% |
Dividends
MSFT.NEO vs. IREN - Dividend Comparison
MSFT.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while IREN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IREN IREN Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT.NEO Microsoft Corp CDR | 0.89% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.75% | 1.07% | 0.19% |
Financials
MSFT.NEO vs. IREN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Microsoft Corp CDR and IREN Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFT.NEO and IREN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MSFT.NEO and IREN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer