PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFRX vs. MFEKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFRX vs. MFEKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFRX achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than MFEKX's 6.33% return. Over the past 10 years, MSFRX has underperformed MFEKX with an annualized return of 7.97%, while MFEKX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.77% annualized return.


MSFRX

1D
0.05%
1M
0.98%
YTD
3.03%
6M
4.12%
1Y
11.65%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
7.97%

MFEKX

1D
-0.34%
1M
4.76%
YTD
6.33%
6M
6.01%
1Y
17.76%
3Y*
26.68%
5Y*
14.46%
10Y*
17.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFRX vs. MFEKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSFRX
MFS Total Return Fund
3.03%10.98%14.73%10.34%-9.70%14.00%9.72%20.20%-5.80%12.18%
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
6.33%12.44%49.62%36.27%-31.07%23.71%31.77%37.82%2.40%30.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFRX and MFEKX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2011

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between MSFRX and MFEKX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFRX vs. MFEKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFRX
MSFRX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MSFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MFEKX
MFEKX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MFEKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFEKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFEKX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MFEKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFEKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFRX vs. MFEKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX) and MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFRXMFEKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

1.06

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.20

3.46

+3.74

MSFRX vs. MFEKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the MFEKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFRX and MFEKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFRXMFEKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.16

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.66

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.84

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.87

-0.22

Drawdowns

MSFRX vs. MFEKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFRX drawdown since its inception was -37.28%, roughly equal to the maximum MFEKX drawdown of -36.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFRX and MFEKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFRXMFEKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.28%

-36.06%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.96%

-17.27%

+12.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.56%

-23.22%

+14.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.02%

-36.06%

+19.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.70%

-36.06%

+11.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-0.34%

-1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-5.64%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

5.30%

-3.65%

Volatility

MSFRX vs. MFEKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Total Return Fund (MSFRX) is 1.76%, while MFS Growth R6 (MFEKX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that MSFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFEKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFRXMFEKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.76%

3.59%

-1.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.92%

12.24%

-7.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.74%

15.83%

-9.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.74%

21.89%

-12.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.45%

21.20%

-10.75%

MSFRX vs. MFEKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFRX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than MFEKX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFRX vs. MFEKX - Dividend Comparison

MSFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.79%, less than MFEKX's 13.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFEKX
MFS Growth R6
13.94%14.82%25.31%4.82%1.04%2.74%3.55%1.57%3.88%2.49%1.70%3.64%
MSFRX
MFS Total Return Fund
8.79%8.93%14.87%6.19%5.38%8.33%6.93%3.22%4.99%5.67%3.54%5.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFRX and MFEKX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFEKX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to MSFRX (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFRX dropped -37.28% vs MFEKX's -36.06%.

MSFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFRX and MFEKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer