PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFO vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFO vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -18.98% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 6.71% return.


MSFO

1D
1.83%
1M
-10.24%
YTD
-18.98%
6M
-19.24%
1Y
-18.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XLRI

1D
1.31%
1M
1.23%
YTD
6.71%
6M
7.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFO vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSFO and XLRI is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFO vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFO
MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

XLRI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFO vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSFOXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

MSFO vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSFO vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFOXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.29%

-7.12%

-22.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.76%

-0.54%

-25.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-1.65%

-5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.12%

Volatility

MSFO vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFOXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.40%

10.99%

+11.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.97%

10.99%

+8.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.97%

10.99%

+8.98%

MSFO vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFO vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.39%, more than XLRI's 12.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSFO
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
46.39%33.91%35.15%6.44%
XLRI
State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
12.24%6.85%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFO and XLRI have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFO.

MSFO has the higher dividend yield at 46.39%, compared with 12.24% for XLRI.

MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFO and 0.35% for XLRI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFO and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer