MSFO vs. XLRI
MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF ) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. MSFO charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
MSFO vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -18.98% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 6.71% return.
MSFO
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -10.24%
- YTD
- -18.98%
- 6M
- -19.24%
- 1Y
- -18.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFO vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
| -18.98% | -2.77% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.71% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFO and XLRI is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFO vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
MSFO
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MSFO vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSFO | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.28 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSFO vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFO | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.29% | -7.12% | -22.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.76% | -0.54% | -25.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -1.65% | -5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.12% | — | — |
Volatility
MSFO vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFO | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.40% | 10.99% | +11.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.97% | 10.99% | +8.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.97% | 10.99% | +8.98% |
MSFO vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSFO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSFO vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.39%, more than XLRI's 12.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
| 46.39% | 33.91% | 35.15% | 6.44% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 12.24% | 6.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFO and XLRI have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MSFO.
MSFO has the higher dividend yield at 46.39%, compared with 12.24% for XLRI.
MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFO and 0.35% for XLRI.
Find the right allocation for MSFO and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer