PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSFO vs. ULTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSFO vs. ULTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly lower than ULTY's 11.14% return.


MSFO

1D
-2.81%
1M
2.02%
YTD
-9.19%
6M
-7.90%
1Y
-4.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ULTY

1D
-1.25%
1M
4.53%
YTD
11.14%
6M
9.84%
1Y
8.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSFO vs. ULTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MSFO
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
-9.19%15.69%2.80%
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
11.14%-0.84%0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between MSFO and ULTY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2024

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSFO vs. ULTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSFO
MSFO Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MSFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ULTY
ULTY Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ULTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ULTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSFO vs. ULTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSFOULTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.08

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.17

0.34

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.37

0.67

-1.04

MSFO vs. ULTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSFO Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the ULTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSFO and ULTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSFOULTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

0.40

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.17

+0.44

Drawdowns

MSFO vs. ULTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, which is greater than ULTY's maximum drawdown of -26.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and ULTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSFOULTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.29%

-26.85%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.29%

-24.16%

-5.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.79%

-8.88%

-7.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.56%

-9.37%

+2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.16%

12.31%

+0.85%

Volatility

MSFO vs. ULTY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF (ULTY) at 4.51%. This indicates that MSFO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSFOULTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.28%

4.51%

+3.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.23%

15.03%

+4.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

20.79%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

26.92%

-7.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.78%

26.92%

-7.14%

MSFO vs. ULTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSFO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than ULTY's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSFO vs. ULTY - Dividend Comparison

MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.67%, less than ULTY's 114.67% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSFO
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
38.67%33.91%35.15%6.44%
ULTY
YieldMax Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF
114.67%142.99%111.70%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSFO and ULTY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSFO has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to ULTY (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.29% vs ULTY's -26.85%.

On 1-year performance, ULTY leads with 8.24% vs -4.82% for MSFO. On fees, MSFO is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, ULTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ULTY has performed better with a 8.24% return vs -4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MSFO is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for ULTY.

ULTY has the higher dividend yield at 114.67%, compared with 38.67% for MSFO.

MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while ULTY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for MSFO and 1.14% for ULTY.

ULTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSFO and ULTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer