MSFO vs. TSLY
MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF ) and TSLY (YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Options Trading funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFO returned -4.82% vs 24.54% for TSLY. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MSFO vs. TSLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly lower than TSLY's -1.68% return.
MSFO
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- -9.19%
- 6M
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- -4.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 5.56%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFO vs. TSLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
| -9.19% | 15.69% | 10.34% | 18.38% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | -1.68% | 13.62% | 27.83% | -0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFO and TSLY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2023 | 0.33 |
The correlation between MSFO and TSLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFO vs. TSLY — Risk / Return Rank
MSFO
TSLY
MSFO vs. TSLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFO | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.14 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 1.14 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 2.75 | -3.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFO | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 0.65 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.30 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
MSFO vs. TSLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, smaller than the maximum TSLY drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and TSLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFO | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.29% | -49.52% | +20.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.29% | -21.64% | -7.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.79% | -8.07% | -8.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -20.00% | +13.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.16% | 9.10% | +4.06% |
Volatility
MSFO vs. TSLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) is 8.28%, while YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (TSLY) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that MSFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFO | TSLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.28% | 9.96% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.23% | 22.37% | -3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 38.18% | -16.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 45.50% | -25.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 45.50% | -25.72% |
MSFO vs. TSLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSFO and TSLY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MSFO vs. TSLY - Dividend Comparison
MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.67%, less than TSLY's 83.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
| 38.67% | 33.91% | 35.15% | 6.44% |
TSLY YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | 83.79% | 91.19% | 82.30% | 76.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFO and TSLY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLY has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to MSFO (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.29% vs TSLY's -49.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSLY leads with 24.54% vs -4.82% for MSFO. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MSFO has been the lower-risk option at 8.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLY has performed better with a 24.54% return vs -4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSFO and TSLY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
TSLY has the higher dividend yield at 83.79%, compared with 38.67% for MSFO.
TSLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFO and TSLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer