MSFO vs. PLTY
MSFO (YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF ) and PLTY (YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSFO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by YieldMax, while PLTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSFO returned -4.82% vs 4.68% for PLTY. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
MSFO vs. PLTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSFO achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly higher than PLTY's -13.54% return.
MSFO
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- YTD
- -9.19%
- 6M
- -7.90%
- 1Y
- -4.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTY
- 1D
- -5.53%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- -13.54%
- 6M
- -14.25%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFO vs. PLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
| -9.19% | 15.69% | 0.83% |
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | -13.54% | 78.06% | 49.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSFO and PLTY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2024 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSFO vs. PLTY — Risk / Return Rank
MSFO
PLTY
MSFO vs. PLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) and YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSFO | PLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.06 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | 0.14 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.37 | 0.26 | -0.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSFO | PLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 | 0.11 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.26 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
MSFO vs. PLTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSFO drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, smaller than the maximum PLTY drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSFO and PLTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSFO | PLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.29% | -36.61% | +7.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.29% | -34.41% | +5.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.79% | -25.02% | +8.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -12.77% | +6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.16% | 17.72% | -4.56% |
Volatility
MSFO vs. PLTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) is 8.28%, while YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF (PLTY) has a volatility of 15.13%. This indicates that MSFO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSFO | PLTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.28% | 15.13% | -6.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.23% | 32.38% | -13.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 43.50% | -21.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 52.94% | -33.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 52.94% | -33.16% |
MSFO vs. PLTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MSFO and PLTY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
MSFO vs. PLTY - Dividend Comparison
MSFO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.67%, less than PLTY's 108.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFO YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF
| 38.67% | 33.91% | 35.15% | 6.44% |
PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 108.80% | 112.44% | 7.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSFO and PLTY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PLTY has higher volatility (15.13%) compared to MSFO (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSFO dropped -29.29% vs PLTY's -36.61%.
On 1-year performance, PLTY leads with 4.68% vs -4.82% for MSFO. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, MSFO has been the lower-risk option at 8.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PLTY has performed better with a 4.68% return vs -4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSFO and PLTY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
PLTY has the higher dividend yield at 108.80%, compared with 38.67% for MSFO.
MSFO is categorized as Options Trading, while PLTY is Derivative Income.
PLTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MSFO and PLTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer